Jump to content

gimpeltf

Members
  • Content Count

    4,983
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by gimpeltf

  1. Thanks, I couldn't remember which match caused the dismissals but I knew there was a connection. And I think some reporters (Flo maybe?) put together something showing how UZE benefited from a series of common bad calls from a given official or set of.
  2. Judgment call, actually. There were several issues of the officiating crews (one particular official in this case on the review panel). I believe they sent a few home after this. The call wasn't out of the question wrong. It involved fleeing the hold the last few seconds and MGL was doing that but seemed over the top to call it when he had just scored to go ahead seconds earlier and there was hardly a guarantee that if he did engage that the other guy could have scored.
  3. The most important part was on the first page or two.
  4. Did you read it? It wasn't just recruiting.
  5. https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/miCaseView/report?id=101807
  6. He would likely have redshirted '90 and would have lost '93 since he stayed at OSU.
  7. Every now and then the reason for the nature of the protest should be explained. It's a Mongolian custom to do that when they feel they were robbed. Note how he handed the clothes to the table. They're saying you robbed me already so take everything else.
  8. https://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/ncaa-announces-health-and-safety-plans-all-other-winter-championships?division=d1 Main part The first portion of the plan calls for all rounds of the winter championships to be held at predetermined sites, rather than at traditional sites that are not predetermined. Bids for predetermined preliminary rounds will be accepted now through Jan. 25, with the host sites to be announced the week of Feb. 8. For championships that typically have predetermined sites that have previously been announced, those sites will continue to host as long as local public health authorities determine it is safe to do so.
  9. I have no idea what you're saying. In D2/D3 you can leave school for a year or two for no good reason and the clock resumes where it was when you left. In D1 you have to have one of the specific reasons otherwise you've got 5 years to do 4.
  10. Agree- in HS (I know which forum this is) though it's fairly common.
  11. That's the D1 rule which says they have 5 consecutive years (with some exceptions- severe injury or Olympic RS). D2/3 (not sure about NAIA but likely) don't need to have the semesters consecutive.
  12. Not an expert on that but although he was partially locked (Left hand wrapped to Arg left leg) I think he would have needed to get Arg legs straighter. They were quite bent allowing Arg to sit up.
  13. Don't understand- 2 danger (after a 3 count If I'm following at all) is a takedown so that's all it would be anyway.
  14. The Great Pumpkin as we called him was 370-380.
  15. Bio says the second- Will. And he's younger than the other.
  16. No, but I see what you mean. It was saying you can't win gold after losing but it did say even if you get another match- which could mean whether or not. He didn't get another match after losing but wouldn't have gotten another after winning either. But I get you.
  17. For all that it mattered, it was under current rules. Yes, they did do pools- that's where Slay beat Saitiev. Under much older rules that could have ended up similar to Smith with Saitiev still winning. But here the Slay-Leopold match was the gold medal match. Admittedly, it wasn't quite the scenario you were hinting at. Essentially, here the match was removed from existence.
  18. Get your own story straight. That wasn't the statement made. It was that you couldn't win gold after losing a match.
  19. Brandon Slay did exactly that!
  20. Did they wrestle 15 years ago and they're just showing a replay?
  21. I know what I showed. You are correct that other countries would need to be factored in but what I left out here was that Serbia shows (or showed) to be a Don't Go There country from the state dept/dept of Health and in large part based on the charts which had Serbia much higher at that time than France shows now. The govt would base this on the country not others showing up. That factoring of others would have come from USAW. I was just trying to get some people to think of each decision on its own merit based on the data not as an If you can't (can) go to one place you can't (can) go to any basis.
×
×
  • Create New...