Jump to content

nom

Members
  • Content Count

    3,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

nom last won the day on October 23 2018

nom had the most liked content!

About nom

  • Rank
    Gold Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Actually, I think I directly addressed your thoughts just now. I sure hope you appreciate the MAJOR importance of the words 'I believe.'
  2. nom

    Final Forfeits

    GockeS -- I do have to say thanks for actually replying directly to my questions. We've cleared this up. I understand now what you were pointing at. I can't say definitively that TBar not answering my question is because of the reason I believe. If I did claim that it was definitive proof, I would agree with you .. that would not be right. But I do believe it ... I can't think of another reason but there may be.
  3. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Just wanted to make sure this was captured. You edited your other humorous reply. Again, I said "I believe" .... I did not say it was a hard fact ... but I do believe it is a reasonable conclusion. Thus, "I believe."
  4. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Here is what I wrote: TBar - please. One more time. Please answer my question. If you do not, I believe all on here should recognize that you have no interest in honest debate. Instead you are here simply to smear and tarnish Koll. Note, I said "I believe ..." Please explain how this is a logical fallacy. I'm super super curious now .... my belief / my opinion is a logical fallacy. Note, I did not say If this, then that. I said if this, then I believe .... You are learning 2 things tonight apparently. Beliefs and opinions are not logical statements that can be disproven.
  5. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Lurker - TBar is seeking to smear the Cornell camp. You are trying to defend against the smear. I get it. Bravo to you.
  6. nom

    Final Forfeits

    You are right, it is not a logical fallacy. Nor is it a 'false dilemna.' (yes, now I'm rubbing it in based on the reply you quickly edited). Now, I'll await TBar's non-answer.
  7. nom

    Final Forfeits

    HHAHHAHAHAH . Nice edit GockeS. I saw it. By your logic, your inability to spell apparently makes you ineligible for this discussion. Hhahahahhaha.
  8. nom

    Final Forfeits

    I'll spell it out one more time. IF Cael choose to file a protest / appeal for a similar type of event, would TBar feel it is ok for him to get counsel as part of the process? Please explain how this is a logical fallacy.
  9. nom

    Final Forfeits

    LOL. Please. What I asked is nothing like this. And the fact that this is your best example tells me you have no idea about logic.
  10. nom

    Final Forfeits

    OK, so you can't explain? Is it a 'false dilemna?' You've spelled it this way twice. I believe you mean dilemma. Yes, learning is fun. I'm looking forward to learning.
  11. nom

    Final Forfeits

    First it was a false dilemma ... now it is a logical fallacy. I did just google logical fallacy. I don't understand why you think it is a logical fallacy. Please explain.
  12. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Ugarte - exactly. Folks can be mad that Koll / Yianni filed a protest / appeal. Fine. But to now say that once in that process he should not have gotten counsel is the argument of someone that doesn't understand how these things work.
  13. nom

    Final Forfeits

    Huh? Now I'm curious. Please explain.
  14. Who is M2? Which bracket will have 4 champs?
  15. nom

    Bo Nickal

    This is what I was referring to. He had plenty of real competition in college. Edit to answer your question (I don't want to be like TBar) - Nickal does not have a deep freestyle resume. Agreed. I'm discussing his college victories. Very impressive and very dominating. I think he will evolve and be very very good at freestyle. Will he represent team USA at world championships or Olympics? I can see it happening but I would not think so before 2021.
×