Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks for the PBP—much appreciated.
  2. Counting on fingers he mumbles words to himself, strangling verse with rules
  3. Updated: Hawk wrestlers step to the line while keyboard warriors charge at windmills.
  4. It's a different question, but I'd ask: which career would I want if I were in their shoes? I'd say Bull: three Big Ten Championships is pretty awesome. It sucks to never have won an NCAA title, but that applies to both guys (even though Wick placed higher those two years). I like Bulls' wins over VJ as well--some great highlights in addition to the disappointments.
  5. I get it, but when watching the trophy ceremony, these guys are happy. They worked hard for this victory.
  6. I wasn't sure at first, but I think Ferrari is great. A little bit of Pat Downey, sure, but with the goods to back up the swagger. True frosh champ and entertaining all the way.
  7. Hey Chapman--thanks for the response. Just to follow up: I want to start by saying that I'm on the side of science when it comes to most things (e.g., environmental policy). But, from what I've read and studied, the relationship between modern 'science'--which is a relatively recent phenomenon in human history--and racism--which is about as old as human history--is fairly vexed. That's my opinion, but I'd say it's well established in research circles. To your other post: I'm not suggesting that 'facts' don't exist or that the practice of genetics isn't effective. (I'll admit that advances in gene editing scare me just a bit.) I'm definitely not saying that we shouldn't draw on different sciences in our decision making. The point I'm circling around relates specifically to how different sciences--like molecular biology and/or genetics--frame the world, shape the social imaginary, and eventually seep their way into our discourse and thinking about each other (the latter two of which are inextricably related). I know I'm not getting at all the nuance here, but that'd be a book, and many conversations besides. On a personal note, I've been frequenting these boards for years, and while I don't post a whole lot--too little time!--I feel compelled in the moment to take time out of my day and join in the fray. The impetus is pretty simple, and the reason I started this thread: I listened to the USA Wrestling pod re: the experience of black athletes and was inspired to do something. If any one of those men happens to read this post, I'd like to thank them for their leadership, on the mat and off. In the end, my take may not mean much some people, but even one random member of this community reads a post like this, and it affirms their personhood, or emboldens them to do something--here, there, wherever--I feel OK about what I'm committing to this forum. And I wish you well.
  8. Just dropping in here with a couple brief thoughts on the relationship between race and science. Mainly because: there's been some logic thrown around on this thread that goes something like, 'it's science, so it can't be racist'. The reality: science has been used to support racism and race-based policy for centuries. Sometimes it's perpetuated by scientists themselves (e.g., https://www.amazon.com/Mismeasure-Man-Revised-Expanded/dp/0393314251). Sometimes taken up and twisted by demagogues: see the history of 20th century genetics and eugenics ala WWII era Germany. These are just two examples, but there are others, continuing on into the present day. With that said, I'd like to be clear on a couple points: 1) I'm not talking here about what's in people's heart of hearts (including KD's); I'm talking about discourse that has literally been used by avowedly racist individuals and political parties throughout history to justify horrific acts (including chattel slavery). 2) Statements that use ‘science’ as a counterpoint to racism (e.g., It's biology, it can't be racist!) simply don't hold up from a historical or logical point of view. Here's a point: you may not be a racist if you say Dake was simply talking about 'science, evolution, and biology and not racism'; but, you are tapping into a very similar, if not the same, logic that has been used by racists--including the national socialist party--to justify and perpetuate actions like human enslavement and mass genocide. So the question: if you use reasoning that racists use, and use often, does that make you a racist? Maybe not. But if it were me, I’d do some hard thinking.
  9. I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or if you actually believe what you're saying. Either way, I can't imagine anyone one who has read and understood The New Jim Crow could get behind the narrow and radically simplistic reasoning you've articulated here. But to your second point, which I think has promise in a way: there's no reason why social programs, book reading, and self reflection can't be combined with personal responsibility, hard work, and a commitment to excellence. In fact, one could argue that it's an unnecessary and problematic separation that has historically been used to characterize some groups as 'lazy' and immoral and others as industrious and morally righteous. Similar to the leadership at USA Wrestling, I believe that wrestling can improve race relations and respond to injustice (https://www.teamusa.org/USA-Wrestling/Features/2020/June/01/USA-Wrestling-statement-on-social-justice), but these efforts will always be hindered by the type of inane thinking you represent in your post.
  10. Hey Katie, real quick: here's a link to a recent NYRB article that discusses Edward Said's book Orientalism (1978): https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/05/20/orientalism-then-and-now/ Not trying to be presumptuous--I had it to hand, and I thought you might find it of interest.
  11. Hey Lurker--I appreciate your response, and especially your point about the real-life-situation at Foxcatcher. Good perspective. I'm not sure I agree wholly with everything you're saying (nothing that couldn't be worked out over a beer, I imagine), but I respect the general spirit of what I understand you to be saying.
  12. I said this before, but I’ll clarify again: I’m not talking to you, and I have no interest trying to change your view. Here’s what I am doing, whether you, or anyone else, agrees with what I’m saying: I’m using this site as a platform to communicate about issues that I believe are important. It’s not about me. Let me be even more specific: I think you, LBJ, exemplify the type of ignorance that actively contributes to problems of race in this country. I don’t care what you say about me; I’m only responding to your post because I hope that someone else might see it and feel emboldened to take a stand against the type of ideology you represent. With that in mind, here’s a link for anyone interested in learning more from people who have knowledge on the subject of race in America: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kylewestaway/2020/06/04/20-books-for-2020-a-reading-list-on-race-in-america/#746edb7630b0
  13. Hey—I appreciate your response, and in the spirit of dialogue, I’ll try to offer my own perspective. First: I admit the point I made is complex, even if I phrased it in a simple way. No answer will suffice here; it needs to be an ongoing conversation. Second: for me, when it comes to issues of race in this country, I believe we should listen to and believe people who have experienced firsthand the effects of racism over people who have not had that experience. I’m not inflexible, and I understand the nuance of human experience, but it’s a principle I follow. The bigger issue in my view however doesn’t relate to the particular examples we’ve been discussing. These are mostly figurations through which we are trying to articulate our points of view in this particular moment. What I find important, here, is the stance people are taking toward the topic we are discussing. Meaning: the majority of posts in this thread have been working very hard to develop a counter narrative to discredit anyone who is trying to engage in a meaningful dialogue about race in the wrestling community. That alone is telling. Here’s a few things that have been said or implied by others in this thread: -Racism is a thing of the past and is no longer really an issue in the wrestling community. -DuPont was mentally ill, not racist. (The first is established; the second seems to be a point of debate.) -Anyone who calls attention to issues of race in the wrestling community or our culture is “sick" and "twisted” and should go out into the street and “lick a boot” of a “person of color.” -People like me are blowing things out of proportion for the sake of self-aggrandizement and to make themselves feel better. -People 'get along fine' and will call out racism when they see it in ‘real life’. (Here I’d comment: this does happen, even on the real life of message boards, but according to the men who shared their experiences through USA Wrestling, it certainly doesn’t happen all the time or even in most cases where racism is on display.) I don’t have time to go on right now, but here’s the point I’d make: on a basic level, we can choose to engage carefully with these issues and do the difficult work of listening, learning, and confronting them (online, offline); alternatively, we can spend our time castigating each other and trying to come up with examples and arguments to discredit the idea that racism might be an issue in this community and in this country. I'm doing my best to embody the former. I never claimed to have answers, and I have no interest in ‘puffing my chest’. It’s a wrestling message board, and I’m here because I’m a wrestler. Sorry for the length of post—but now I’ve got to get back to the grind.
  14. A couple quick points, and then I've got to hit it. 1) if you haven't checked it out already, watch the video USA Wrestling published yesterday. You'll hear from Jordan Burroughs, J'Den Cox, Mark Hall, and several other awesome men who share their experiences as black athletes in the sport of wrestling. We should listen to them and believe them. 2) The men I just mentioned, if I understand them correctly, asked people in the community to take a stand and speak up about the very issues we're discussing. I'm not looking to speak for them; I'm just doing my best to amplify the message in the best way I know how. I'm glad to be educated and change my thinking if they think I'm missing the point. 3) It's a tired and fallacious argument to say that racism is a 'thing of the past' or it's just 'a few bad apples'. It's just not true, and my saying so doesn't make me a sick or twisted person. 4) I'm not interested in grandstanding. This is a wrestling message board, not Twitter. And I'm an anonymous poster who should be in bed, not a celebrity who is looking to bolster my image. 5) I'm proud of USA Wrestling's efforts to be an inclusive organization. I've always supported these efforts--the work is never done. Finally: I don't know who you are, but whatever anger you're feeling toward me, you should direct toward something meaningful. I'm one of the good guys.
  • Create New...