Jump to content

pish6969

Members
  • Content Count

    859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About pish6969

  • Rank
    Bronze Member

Recent Profile Visitors

133 profile views
  1. pish6969

    Ryan Deakin

    @TBAR why try to defend a guy that needs no defending. Just because they throw the bait out there, you don’t have to bite every time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. pish6969

    Ryan Deakin

    #NolfNextTopic Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. pish6969

    Stoll #1?

    Agree. My take is he shouldn’t have wrestled at all this year even if there was a slight chance of reinjure the knee. If was never ready until B1Gs then so be it. Let him wrestle his first match at B1Gs and steal a spot This picking and choosing opponents makes no sense to me from a rehab perspectives Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. pish6969

    Iowa vs Minn

    Maybe not a duck but something strange here. If you listen to matcast podcast from few days ago. They interview Goodale and Eggum. Goodale says more guys sit against Suriano than anyone. He said he didn’t hear about skin condition until 5 minutes before weigh ins and it was Minnesota trainer that said he couldn’t go. Eggum comes on later in interview and say they felt they covered up the skin condition and it was Rutgers call to not let him wrestle. Someone’s lying Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    Spey.. This isn’t for Flo specifically. I don’t know how others feel, but personally it would be cool if rankings were done preseason and up until after holiday tournies like you guys have done in past (preseason starts with placement from last year), no freshman, etc. Then after the holiday tournies you can change it up and start ranking based on a combination of the normal method and change it to more predictive. I think at this point in the year we shouldnt have situations where we say “oh we know they 3rd ranked guy would beat the #1 guy and it’s just how rankings work.” Thoughts? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    Thx for your time and thought. Although I don’t agree with your take, I appreciate the explanation. Every other ranking service has this weight correct so maybe Flo the outlier on this one. Like you said, it will play itself out soon Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    You’re missing the point. The first rankings were 1. Martin 2. Parker 3 Venz 4 Zz 5 Shak. Venz and Zz lost to guys outside the top 10 not to guys in front of them. So when ZZ lost, Shak should have moved up to 4. When Venz lost, Shak should have moved to 3. I agree with you if Venz or ZZ lost to Martin or Parker there shouldn’t be any movement for those guys since they lost to a higher ranked guy. When they lost, not only did they stay ahead of Shak, they moved the lower ranked guys ahead of Shak Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    Can you explain Rasheed please. Why did he go from 5 to 7 without taking a loss? The guys ahead of him at the time (Venz/Zz) lost. Don’t you normally move the guy from 5 up? For example. Dhesi just lost. You moved him to 5 and everyone moved up a spot. You didn’t bring Parris to 1, Dhesi 2 etc (and I agree with that) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    No doubt he’ll get his chances. The point was how does a guy go from 5 to 7 without taking a loss? Every guy they have in front of him has taken losses and some multiple. I don’t think any of the matches you mentioned are tough except Parker and Myles who are the only 2 that should be ranked ahead at this point Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. pish6969

    New Flo Rankings

    What I don’t get with Rasheed. He started at 5 preseason. Once the guys ahead of him lost he should have moved up not down. That’s normally how it works Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. pish6969

    Steveson’s Behavior

    I just think Steveson wants to put on a show and when guys go out, turtle up, hug the edges he gonna make a fool out of you. I read somewhere that before the RU match the Rutgers kid was staring him down and talking a little trash. I have no clue if that’s true or not. If so, wrong guy to do that to. I see Gable as a bulletin board guy and if he even feels the slightest slight he gonna make you miserable. IF Stoll does take the mat I think it’ll be ugly for the Big man from Iowa. I’m sure Gable takes it as a slight that some rankers still have Stoll #1 Wrestle him, go hard and I doubt you see these antics. We’ll see.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. pish6969

    Fix v. Nick

    Does anyone here really feel confident in their pick? I sure don’t. These two are as close as can be. A true pickem. I would take Suriano over Micic Micic over Fix Fix over Gross Gross over Suriano Gross over Micic Confusing I know Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. pish6969

    Fix v. Nick

    Put me down for Suriano. Gonna be a close 3-2 match Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. pish6969

    First NCAA Most Dominant for 2019

    Cenzo already has 3 wins against top 20 guys and two in the top 5 and he’s still over 5. Everyone wrestles close matches the better the comp gets. I’m sure the numbers will come down for most if not all of these guys but doubt the list changed much Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. Not from my angle. He was flat more than once Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×