Jump to content

ugarte

Members
  • Content Count

    952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by ugarte

  1. +I can watch it. My point is i don't think you need ACC Extra if you have ESPN+ but I wouldn't bet my house on my own understanding.
  2. fair - though i think you have to have cable to get espn+ at all, regardless of whether it is ACC, cornhole or cricket and i don't think i have ACC Extra in NYC.
  3. Campbell vs VT tomorrow on ESPN+ there's also an archive of Citadel vs NAIA Southeastern
  4. thx - I think ESPN+ streams a lot of ACC Extra content. ACC wrestling was on ESPN+ last year, that's why I asked. thx also to @Mphillips
  5. Channel 316 on Spectrum in Queens. Women's finals on now.
  6. thanks all - surprised that the olympic channel was showing it on cable but it doesn't have the rights to show replays online.
  7. look, since the same people who say that "race doesn't matter and noticing race is the real racism" also tend to say that the disparate outcomes in all sorts of areas are because of some social pathology or what have you about the disadvantaged communities themselves i don't think it's a real mystery what the actual racist statement is. you are as deep as a puddle.
  8. there wasn't a question. laughing at you was a response.
  9. noting historical firsts is not racism. angrily responding when someone points out a potential historical first, well, (also, i think the answer is no, we will not)
  10. there's a difference between sharing the rules so your friends don't get busted and being the cop who reports them.
  11. is there a bigger falloff from starter to backup than dake to balfour? i will say that balfour had some decent moves over the course of losing every match but hoo boy. takeaway from this tournament is that the kids are coming to snatch gwiz's crown. parris should have won both matches and steveson did win his, comfortably. i also don't think steveson ducked parris; tony nelson isn't a guy you bring to watch the action.
  12. Dake and the Deans bowed out a few days ago. Haven't said why as far as I know.
  13. if the non-compete expired what did the injunction cover? terms like "crystal ball" and "big board"?
  14. I may be confusing trials, but I think I read that even the people who were immunized and contracted the virus, it was a relatively mild case, which is also a good sign for efficacy, right? It sounds like an indication that the vax helps prime the body's natural immune response and keeps the virus somewhat under control. I think the answer here is not to "trust" China or to take what they say as gospel or to even prefer, broadly, China's approach to government. It is to ask "is there value, in limited cases, of more direct government action." In cases where the government response was aggressive - not only China but also, for example, Vietnam - the virus was easier to contain. This doesn't necessarily reflect an endorsement of that governmental approach in all cases but rather as a possible indication that during an emergency there might be some value in top-down rules rather than reliance on the good will of your neighbors (especially when numbers are increasing rapidly, suggesting less-than-neighborly compliance). In Sweden and South Dakota, jurisdictions that embrace theories of herd immunity and maximum personal choice with respect to masks and distancing, the results have been catastrophic. Places that enforce measures briefly but then relax them at the first sign of improvement soon see a rebound (like NYC, where I am). I think there's decent evidence from experience that stricter rules in the short term pay long term dividends. Is that a reasonable middle ground that won't get me asked if I want to move to Guangzhou?
  15. No but that's why i mostly focus on law and the parts of the "debate" on what CDC and various health departments say in their public statements. Such as "Alito is insane and unprincipled" and "the reason the Michigan Supreme Court ruled against Whitmer is because she is a Democratic Governor with a Republican Supreme Court."
  16. he's been too extreme, at various points, for roberts, kavanaugh and gorsuch this term. AND I HATE THOSE GUYS TOO.
  17. i read everything he writes. he is insane and unprincipled. i'm sorry if that disappoints you to hear.
  18. Alito is insane and unprincipled. You should know that.
  19. The first part is paranoid weirdness. What do seat belts really restrain? MY FREEDOM, MAN!!! The second part, about the hypocrisy of the elites, is more on point except that you draw the wrong conclusion from it. Yes, the elites flaunting the rules that they hand down to the rabble is intensely annoying. But that doesn't mean that they don't think the rules are pointless or that there's a sECreT AgENdA at work, it's that they don't care because they are ultimately selfish and consider themselves untouchable. What you are mad at, then, is a mirror.
  20. it is with a heavy heart that i report that despite my support for all sorts of mask mandates and business shutdowns, i do not think you need to be masked all the time when outdoors, particularly when trail running (which you will never catch me doing)
×
×
  • Create New...