Jump to content

nhs67

Members
  • Content Count

    7,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by nhs67


  1. 3 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    I admit, you are becoming difficult to follow.

    • What doesn't prove anything? I don't understand what you're saying here.
    • Keep going? I'm responding to your posts that are attacking me. If you'd like me to stop interacting with you, you may want to stop attacking me.
    • Toots? Hmmm..

    Such a soft constitution you have there, toots.

    Charmin Ultra Soft.


  2. 11 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    Oh, got it. You have a problem with me stating that others agreed with me. Because I can't prove it, that makes it trolling. (Initially I thought you were referring to my opinion as being something I can't prove. Which would be true. I misunderstood.)

    Interesting. You have a point, the part where I mentioned "jumping into a pit of snakes." That I can't confirm. I was speculating as to why they don't post. I don't know that to be true. That is not a fact, it was speculation. (See how a discussion can work well? You question something I post, and I have an opportunity to respond to it. Then we all understand each other a little better.)

    I can actually prove that some agree with me. Go back and look at the 'likes' I have gotten in this thread. I believe that confirms that others do agree with me.

    It doesn't prove anything.

    That's it.

    You've surpassed Dan now.

    Keep going, though, toots.


  3. 3 minutes ago, boconnell said:

    Not one person sees it anything close to the way you see it.  Tons of people who hate Iowa don't see any of what you saw.  You had a bad take that you aggressively shared, and then you showed back up to defend your terrible take while also giving manners lessons. 

    Your lack of awareness in this thread is off the charts.  You actually think you're the reasonable one and everyone else is unreasonable.  You should ask a friend to read this thread without telling them who is who and then ask them who the unreasonable one is.

    To be fair, I have entered the chat and I am being purposely unreasonable.


  4. 1 minute ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    Not sure what your 1st point means.  I am posting my opinion. I can't prove it - you'll have to take my word that it is, in fact, my opinion.

    Trolling is to "make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them."

     

    Your 2nd part of this proves you are trolling, in regards to your first part.

    Specifically stated others agreed with toy but wouldn't post.  Ergo you cannot prove otherd agree with you.


  5. 5 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    On the contrary, you're claiming my opinion is of no use because you don't agree with it. 

    I'm not even close to stating everyone else's view sucks and mine doesn't. Take a closer look in the mirror, that's exactly what you're doing to me here.

    I repeat myself because I'm not backing down from my opinion because its unpopular among Iowa fans.

    You seem to keep posting over and over and over again as well, and I'm not asking you any questions at all.

    No I am claiming your opinion is of no use because it is of no use.

    You repeat yourself because perhaps you believe you can WILL a useless opinion into being less useless.

    The fact that I have chosen to engage in this threat in a trolling manner proves that all you are doing is trolling.  Trolls attract trolls.

    I also dgaf if you have asked me any questions.  Did you pay my mother child support?  You my daddy?  Stfu.


  6. 1 minute ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    Not trolling. Trolling is something different. I was actually initiating a discussion that I believed in, and still do. As unpopular as it is.

    The entire forum doesn't disagree with me. I've gotten multiple notes from those that agree...but they choose not to post because it's akin to jumping into a pit of snakes.

    So now you only post what you can't prove?  Bollocks.

    You're approaching the DanTheMan level with this one.

    Not much further and it's JimmyCin level troll.


  7. Just now, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    No. As I've pointed out many times, people don't need to agree to participate in discussions (those would be pretty boring discussions if everyone agreed.)

    My definition of useful discussion means that the participants don't call names and attack each other with snarky remarks.

    But that's just me. You can certainly participate in any discussion as you like. Many on this board seem to enjoy attacking each other than useful discussion.j

    Your contributions have been of no use, either.

    Because, as I said: If folks don't agree with you spend three days repeating yourself over and over and over about how their view sucks and yours does not.  The definition of insanity is what, again?

     


  8. 21 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

    The "playing the victim" thing is getting old. That's not even remotely the case.

    See my last post about useful discussions. It applies directly here as well.

    Your definition of useful discussion simply means 'Agree with me or you suck.'

    Fortunately nobody is weak enough to actually agree with your low constitution.


  9. 1 hour ago, Idaho said:

    Surber's best win is over the #51 wrestler and has lost to the #34 wrestler.... Is that borderline AA? Gremmel won the Big 12, beat Harris  and lost to only two guys the entire season last year ... Schultz and Parris...so he actually had a great season not just tournament. It was actually Harris who had the good run at the tournament.  I would agree that nobody knows what kind of shape he is in so that would remain to be seen. I also agree that maybe Smith doesn't want to upset the future by bringing in a guy right now....  but he is sitting on the edge of a trophy so who knows. 

    All fair points.  I do not concede that he is an upgrade still.

    Was just never a fan, tbh.  Surber at least moves.


  10. On 1/10/2022 at 5:15 PM, hammerlockthree said:

    I'll say that I don't know much about covington, but the stuff I've heard about downey through the grapevine is worse than whats floated on here.

    Same here.  Apparently he isn't training where he says he is, yeah?

    Since he has transitioned over to MMA I am full-on in support of his success again, but he is going to find out real quick that Bellator isn't some drunked out frat boys.  If he even makes it there.  He has to actually show up, which includes finding his own flights.

×
×
  • Create New...