Jump to content

nhs67

Members
  • Content Count

    7,110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by nhs67


  1. 1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

    tbh i find some truth in it. a decent amount, actually. 

    the fact of the matter is that college coaches and organizations in power in this sport hold it back - including but not limited to - the coverage of it. 

    I don't disagree in the slightest, either.  That doesn't change that he is the worst 'media' person to try to act like people not holding themselves accountable to their own words, as well as honest integrity.  It is preposterous that he would even attempt to soap box it.


  2. 2 hours ago, lu_alum said:


    I believe the month-to-month option on gymnastics ended a couple years ago.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    I quit doing month by month like 6 or 7 years ago, myself?  I am on the hook for $150 a year.  As much crap as it talked, they are still the gold standard and are comparatively worth the $12.50 a month it comes out to.


  3. 12 minutes ago, klehner said:

    Isn't that fraud?  You agree to pay them for a year's subscription, and then refuse to pay it?

    The prepaid way is actually how I did the first year I had.  It isn't fraudulent as it charges you the $150 like a regular card.  If the funds aren't on there it won't go through.  After a year you would/will need to put in new payment information once your subscription expires.  Fairly easy and simple.  Expiration date gets here and you no longer have access.  Update info and click pay, and blammo you're good again.  So in actuality that first year for me was ~$153.


  4. 59 minutes ago, Mphillips said:

    The most impressive statement in the entire post...

    It was years ago.  Legit 6 or 7 years ago.  I don't know if I would or could do that now.  Also, as I said it was Flogymnastics.  Not sure how their CS systems work or are related.  They may very well be the same.  I know the streaming 'issues' are pretty consistent across platforms.  Not complaining, as I understand that there are dozens of factors not pertaining to Flo or their staff that will cause issues with these.


  5. 17 minutes ago, gallison said:

    Edmond was the only Mizzou wrestler that out performed my expectations.  O'Toole and Rocky Elam both looked strong, but that was expected.  I was a little disappointed by Jacques and Mauler performance at 157.

    Edmond looked explosive, athletic and extremely fast.  If he continues to improve as fast as he has this season, he'll AA or sure.  Looked amazing!

    It surprised me how much he gassed.   He was out of it at the end of the 2nd.  If he can get that tank up and push for 7 full minutes he wins that match next time.

    He isn't big or sucking a lot of weight, in fact it could be argued that he is small for 149.  So I am unsure the reason.  Was a big fan, now a bigger fan.  Excited for the future with him.


  6. That isn't true.

    You can do a month by month on one of the other platforms, such as Gymnastics (which was my original foray).  It ends up being $30, or at least it was.  You actually save a LOT of money going the yearly route via Flowrestling than I did on the Gymnastics, and I had the Gymnastics monthly for nearly two years before I realized I could even do a yearly one.  I am sure it was an option, but it was poorly communicated.  I actually went to Flowrestling and had to get someone on the phone to cancel my monthly for Flogymnastics.  That was how I found out I had the option to do yearly anyways.  Just a gouging method, I am sure.  When I asked about my $210 back from each year I was laughed at, impressively.


  7. 10 hours ago, MadMardigain said:

    Last years four placer is just on the boarder line to AA acourudng to many people. 

    To be fair, we do have a recent CMU turned Penn State staple to compare expectations to.

    https://www.wrestlestat.com/wrestler/12111/keener-corey/profile

    Keener seemed to have plateaued once he hit his RS-SO season, insofar as ratings go, but his production at nationals was the same all three years.  Even with a more difficult schedule at Penn State, he improved his overall winning percentage and bonus point output.

    Even if we expect similar results, he won't just be fringe AA.  Not without a bad draw and a crap tourney.  I expect improved bonus, but a similar winning percentage.  With a more difficult schedule, at that.


  8. 4 hours ago, RegularStalling said:

    Don’t expect Parco to be out there for ASU. That being the case, I don’t really see a path for them to win the dual. Parco being replaced with likely Belton is probably a 7 point swing in a match in which they have a razor thin margin of error.  Prediction: 25-12, Michigan. 

    False.  6 point swing at best.  Storr will only win via Decision.

×
×
  • Create New...