Is Vak superold/oldsuper and should he be banned?

[MSU158 1,614]

1.) He created an incredibly devious trolling topic.

2.) He tagged the topic with multiple shameless tags.

3.) He LIKED his own post.

 

 

I would like to place all of the above into evidence and, in lieu of an unnecessary full blown trial, I move for a summary judgement!

Edited August 25, 2015 by MSU158

[TBar1977 3,953]

Vak isn't superold, but he is doing some of the same things superold did.  Pause for concern to be sure. 

Edited August 25, 2015 by TBar1977

[Jaroslav Hasek 1,902]

harsh but fair

[Guest Kingsland]

Vak has also contributed tons of posts with substance. I do not remember one superold post worth reading. Also Vak seems facetious when he posts goofy stuff, whereas superold was dead serious.

[hammerlockthree 2,084]

I would list Vak among the least offensive posters on here. He got a little divisive defending Gilman once...thats the only bad thing i can think of. 

[Coach_J 2,076]

I prefer ignoring people, not banning them.  Just my preference...

[redblades 322]

Vak is funny... Sometimes.  Superold was never funny.

[JasonBryant 1,711]

Vak is miles and miles better than supertroll. Definitely not the same person. 

[WildTurkey44 321]

I dig the Vak

[VakAttack 3,131]

He seems pretty cool.

[VakAttack 3,131]

Vak is miles and miles better than supertroll. Definitely not the same person.

Well, sure, but where does that leave him? If superold was negative 8 miles and this Vak fella is only 6 miles better, he's still miles better. We Need more quantitative analysis!

[headshuck 2,306]

MSU158 is Vak the self promoter!

[IronChef 811]

It's like this not at all misleading Flo tweet from a few months ago

 

Edited August 25, 2015 by IronChef

[silver-medal 670]

Vak is a quality poster (allowing for his Iowa bias).  

[leshismore 212]

I agree with Silver

[Jaroslav Hasek 1,902]

MSU is not incorrect about points 1, 2 and 3 detailed in the OP. I think it's clear, both who Vak really is and what needs to be done about it. 

[MSU158 1,614]

JB,

 

I agree with you that when Vak posts AS Vak, he is a very solid part of this message board..........;)

[JasonBryant 1,711]

He's not superold/oldsuper. 

[LordNelson 542]

He seems pretty cool.

He's no Flying Tiger.

[LordNelson 542]

Superold=LemonPie

[Bloate 61]

Why do you say superold=lemonpie? Do you have factual evidence to substantiate your premis? Are you sure lemon pie doesn't = green persimmon?

Edited August 26, 2015 by Bloate

[LkwdSteve 142]

Vak has some humor and is not close to having similar wordiness.

[Jaroslav Hasek 1,902]

i think maybe you are all superold. 

[redblades 322]

We have met the Superold, and he is us.

[headshuck 2,306]

We have met the Superold, and he is us.

Noooooooooooo!