Jump to content
TheRealOne9050

65 kg Discussion

Recommended Posts

chamizo should have had 4 at the start of the second not 2, that was a bad call

 

I am not sure why it is interpreted as 2, but it usually gets called that way. When the attacking wrestlers goes for a throw and and is countered, they usually (not always) just give the other guy 2. I like it that way because it rewards going for the throw. I guess the rational is it was Asgarov's move until he stopped him on his back at which point they were already on the ground

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure why it is interpreted as 2, but it usually gets called that way. When the attacking wrestlers goes for a throw and and is countered, they usually (not always) just give the other guy 2. I like it that way because it rewards going for the throw. I guess the rational is it was Asgarov's move until he stopped him on his back at which point they were already on the ground

 

Yes, I think it went like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asgarov could have gotten way more points too.  At the end, when Frank was still not taken down, he was off his knees, meaning he was technically still neutral. THen Asgaraov gutted him and it could have been scored 4...even 2+2 had his knees touched. BUt Frank had to keep from giving up the take down.  But I think a gut from there could be scored a 4 almost or even 2 and 2.  GREAT match though.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asgarov could have gotten way more points too.  At the end, when Frank was still not taken down, he was off his knees, meaning he was technically still neutral. THen Asgaraov gutted him and it could have been scored 4...even 2+2 had his knees touched. BUt Frank had to keep from giving up the take down.  But I think a gut from there could be scored a 4 almost or even 2 and 2.  GREAT match though.  

 

I agree with that, Chamizo went down, 2 points, gut, more 2 points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ruleset suck. Too controversial points. This sport needs also an extra time...

 

How do you want a tie to be broken at the end of extra time? Or do you want matches to potentially go on forever until someone scores?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...