WildTurkey44 321 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 You boyz havin f** yet? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowrestle 633 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 Oh, and I have been to The Hamptons. Most of Jersey's beaches are nicer. People in the Hamptons play tennis, golf, and maybe lacrosse. Most of those folks have never or will ever see a wrestling match. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,764 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 People in the Hamptons play tennis, golf, and maybe lacrosse. Most of those folks have never or will ever see a wrestling match. They play a mean game of croquet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,764 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 I'll take this one. Because Carl is a 'win at all costs' kind of competitor. He helps only himself. Except that is total bull$$$hit, and this case is example number 1. He placed Suriano's health over his team's chances at an NCAA title. They won anyway, despite his extreme care and diligence for his wrestler's long term health. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1032004 815 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 Except that is total bull$$$hit, and this case is example number 1. He placed Suriano's health over his team's chances at an NCAA title. They won anyway, despite his extreme care and diligence for his wrestler's long term health. Why do you keep assuming that was even the issue? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cjc007 636 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) Except that is total bull$$$hit, and this case is example number 1. He placed Suriano's health over his team's chances at an NCAA title. They won anyway, despite his extreme care and diligence for his wrestler's long term health.He didn't seem to care about Andrew Long's long term goals or mental health. As long as Long was granted immediate eligibility, it was very cool for Coach Sanderson. Of course, Carl won and his devotees can't see the forest through the trees. Rationalization is a must for psu and their devoted (deranged) fan base. Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk Edited September 11, 2017 by cjc007 1 scribe reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headshuck 2,177 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 "Extreme care and diligence for each wrestlers long term health." 1 scribe reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) Except that is total bull$$$hit, and this case is example number 1. He placed Suriano's health over his team's chances at an NCAA title. They won anyway, despite his extreme care and diligence for his wrestler's long term health. its a shame he did a 180 and decided to try and take the 2018 NCAA tournament away from him too. I have no problem with Cael playing hard ball. This ultra naive propaganda about the whole issue being Cael caring too much about suriano is intolerable. That ain't what went down. Edited September 12, 2017 by hammerlockthree 1 scribe reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sgallan 592 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Tragic is the part I caught onto. Seriously, tragic? I know lots of tragic things, even a couple in wrestling, but tragic..... is he a silver spoons kid? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flying-Tiger 614 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) He didn't seem to care about Andrew Long's long term goals or mental health. As long as Long was granted immediate eligibility, it was very cool for Coach Sanderson. Of course, Carl won and his devotees can't see the forest through the trees. Rationalization is a must for psu and their devoted (deranged) fan base. Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk The only rationalization going on here are from weak minded fans such as yourself that continue to sulk over Penn State dominance of the sport. You lash out at the fans, vilify Sanderson and why, because you can't handle the reality of the situation. THAT's rationalization. Edited September 12, 2017 by Flying-Tiger Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Who dropped "tragic"? Sorry just ignorant. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 The only rationalization going on here are from weak minded fans such as yourself that continue to sulk over Penn State dominance of the sport. You lash out at the fans, vilify Sanderson and why, because your pee brain can't handle the reality of the situation. THAT's rationalization. You just contort everything into PSU being perfect in every way are you won't be weak minded..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flying-Tiger 614 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Why do you keep assuming that was even the issue? Probably because there is a ton of evidence that is pointing in the direction. Why do you keep assuming it was something else? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 why did cael try to take a year of eligibility away from him if he didn't run the program like a business? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flying-Tiger 614 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) You just contort everything into PSU being perfect in every way are you won't be weak minded..... 6 championships in 7 years, seems to me we shouldn't have much to complain about. Don't get me wrong, I would of liked to see Suriano stick around so they could go for the scoring record and possibly shut out teams like Iowa and Lehigh, but still it's kind of difficult to complain. I guess that's what ticks you guys off, haha. Edited September 12, 2017 by Flying-Tiger Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 6 championships in 7 years, Seems to me we shouldn't have much to complain about. Don't get me wrong, I would of liked to see Suriano stick around so they could go for the scoring record and shut out Iowa, but still it's kind of difficult to complain. I guess that's what ticks you guys off, haha. The problem isn't the championships its the weak minded fans demanding everyone agree upon moral and athletic superiority when that isn't the case.... 1 cjc007 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,764 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Nobody demands you trolls agree with us, but it would be decent to just be decent now and again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowrestle 633 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Governor Christie wants to change the name of Rutgers to the University of New Jersey. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Nobody demands you trolls agree with us, but it would be decent to just be decent now and again. whats your definition of a troll? Mine is someone who pouts and drops the word troll when they don't know what to say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1032004 815 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) Probably because there is a ton of evidence that is pointing in the direction. Why do you keep assuming it was something else?Within the past week was the first time Suriano has spoken about it and I don't really see anything in his comments as evidence that he thought he should've wrestled. "The way my season ended, I wasn't happy with how things were dealt with" could mean various things. Who knows, maybe he knew he wouldn't be able to wrestle and didn't like having to take an unnecessary loss on his record. Or as already mentioned, maybe he was more unhappy with the recommended rehab. What other "evidence" are you referring to? Edited September 12, 2017 by 1032004 1 hammerlockthree reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigTenFanboy 1,710 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 whats your definition of a troll? Mine is someone who pouts and drops the word troll when they don't know what to say. whats your definition of a hammerlockthree? mine is someone who pouts and drops a "you're stupid" when they don't know what to say. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) whats your definition of a hammerlockthree? mine is someone who pouts and drops a "you're stupid" when they don't know what to say. I often ask when I called you stupid and you never respond. BTW you responded with the wrong handle LOL. my remark was directed at tbar! talk about tipping your hat! Edited September 12, 2017 by hammerlockthree Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigTenFanboy 1,710 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) I often asked when I called you stupid and you never respond. BTW you responded with the wrong handle LOL. my remark was directed at tbar! talk about tipping your hat! So? You are an idiot if you think I am tbar. No let me correct myself you're just an idiot regardless if you think I am tbar or not. Edited September 12, 2017 by BigTenFanboy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 1,963 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 Well if you respond to comments directed at him... Just don't confuse your passwords buddy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigTenFanboy 1,710 Report post Posted September 12, 2017 (edited) Well if you respond to comments directed at him... Just don't confuse your passwords buddy. Again so? Does that mean you're nom? You just replied to one of my posts to him. I quoted your post because your description of what a troll means to you is interchangeable with that a headlockethree means to me. Edited September 12, 2017 by BigTenFanboy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
