Seeding 165

[OrangeEffect 18]

Great weight class. How do you think the top eight get seeded?

 

1. Martinez

2. McFadden

3. Joseph

4. Walsh

5. Marsteller

6. Marinelli

7. Lewis

8. Wick

 

Gets tough after the top 3.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[TBar1977 3,299]

I bet that is real close, if not perfect. 

[TobusRex 1,330]

I'd probably put Marinelli at #4 or #5, ahead of Walsh or Marstellar.

[jcwrestlingfan 3]

Can Marinelli really go that high when he lost twice to Massa at the Big 10's? Would it more likely be:

 

1. Martinez 
2. McFadden
3. Joseph
4. Walsh
5. Marsteller 
6. Lewis 

7. Wick
8. Massa

[OrangeEffect 18]

I could see Marinelli as high as 4 based on his overall season.  I just figured his big ten finish would drop him lower.  I could even see him dropping lower than 6 also.  It will be interesting to see what the committee thinks.

[Ogalthorpe Haywood 206]

I think 6 is about where Marinelli falls. Can’t ignore his stellar regular season but also can’t ignore his multiple losses at big tens.

[Juanma25 9]

It'll be interesting to see how they seed 165.  Lewis beat Marinelli this past weekend after losing twice to him earlier in the year and his only other losses are to Joseph and Martinez with wins over Marinelli, Wick, Schleifer, Bethea, White, and Wanzeck.  The only guy he hasn't wrestled in the B10 is Massa.  Not sure Marstellar or Walsh should be seeded over him if seeds are based on this year alone.

[ionel 681]

Can Marinelli really go that high when he lost twice to Massa at the Big 10's? Would it more likely be:

 

1. Martinez 2. McFadden3. Joseph4. Walsh5. Marsteller 6. Lewis 

7. Wick8. Massa

Perhaps not too far off, but we are talking seeds for NCAA & its not just a b10 event. There are others for example Rogers might argue has case to be above Marsteller. No way to fit all those b10 guys in the top 8, Marrinelli tough wrestler but prob not a top 8 seed, just the way it is.

[Housebuye 1,810]

Rogers will be relatively high too

 

I think you are close, but I think two people on your list won't be top 8

[okwrestle 16]

the way I see it:

 

1. Martinez 
2. McFadden
3. Joseph
4. Walsh

5. Rogers
6. Lewis

7. Wick

8. Massa

9. Marinelli

 

 

[LemonPie 1,360]

Thank God we only have to wait until Wednesday

[Housebuye 1,810]

the way I see it:

 

1. Martinez

2. McFadden

3. Joseph

4. Walsh

5. Rogers

6. Lewis

7. Wick

8. Massa

9. Marinelli

Lewis will be higher than that. Maybe even #2

[Plasmodium 1,120]

Man, that tournament wound up a disaster for Marinelli

[LemonPie 1,360]

Lewis will be higher than that. Maybe even #2

Don't see the argument for #2, but in the 4/5 conversation for sure.

[Housebuye 1,810]

Don't see the argument for #2, but in the 4/5 conversation for sure.

Yeah not 2...not sure why I said that. 4 is my guess

[unbiased 423]

Thank God we only have to wait until Wednesday

When speculation turns into complaining.

Edited March 5, 2018 by unbiased

[jcwrestlingfan 3]

Rogers gets hurt by the fact he has a loss to Marinelli. However, a Big 12 championship should account for something. I can see him as either a 6/7 seed 

[ionel 681]

Rogers gets hurt by the fact he has a loss to Marinelli. However, a Big 12 championship should account for something. I can see him as either a 6/7 seed

 

does hurt him, but he sort've avenged the WY dual loss be winning the Big12, believe only other was early season loss (like Marinelli) to undefeated (prob #2) McFadden. So on paper (and thats how they do seeds) prob looks better than Marsteller & all not top 2 or 3 in b10.

[EasyToPin 13]

Rogers gets hurt by the fact he has a loss to Marinelli. However, a Big 12 championship should account for something. I can see him as either a 6/7 seed 

 

Why would you seed Rogers so high? What's his best win? Wanzek of Minnesota? Rogers has losses to Ashworth (Wyoming), Marinelli (Iowa) and McFadden (Virginia Tech). He's probably a 9 or 10 seed.