tbert 561 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 Deep State? Conspiracy-minded people are usually the least-educated in society. They look for simple and singular causes to explain complex phenomena. They claim non-existent things or beings (ghosts, God, aliens, WMDs in Iraq) are real even when there is zero evidence for them. On the other hand, when there is a ton of evidence for something (anthropocentric climate change, Presidential corruption, Russian interference in our elections) they tend to attack the messengers, create distractions, point the finger to people who are no longer or were never in charge, etc. Classic fallacies and obfuscation. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/07/jim-jordan-says-deep-state-is-engineering-his-sex-abuse-scandal I think the correct word that you're trying To find in the words of your divine hero is deplorable Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,953 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 If this thread gets deleted we can deem it the "dmm53" rule. As soon as dmm53 shows up with his left wing socialist political smears the thread goes right into the hopper. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbert 561 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 How about a pic of a couple witches again...that was good stuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Plasmodium 1,699 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 Here is what we have established on one side: 1) The Russians meddled in our election - source: all intelligence organizations 2) The Russians hacked Podesta's email and had them posted online - source: intelligence organizations, Putin 3) Mueller's investigation has indicted dozens of people with hundreds of charges - source: public domain 4) Russia wanted Trump to win - source: Putin 5) Mueller is a Republican - source: public domain Here is what we have established on a different side: 1) Hillary Clinton is crooked - source: A lot of people are saying it 2) The FISA warrants were unwarranted - source: unknown, but obvious 3) A law enforcement investigator didn't like the perp he was investigating - source: Strozk 4) A certain perp doesn't like the people investigating him - source: deduced from Trump's communiques 5) THERE WAS NO COLLUSION - source - Trump 6) Putin said he didn't do it. - source - Trump 1 leshismore reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbert 561 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 Here is what we have established on one side: 1) The Russians meddled in our election - source: all intelligence organizations 2) The Russians hacked Podesta's email and had them posted online - source: intelligence organizations, Putin 3) Mueller's investigation has indicted dozens of people with hundreds of charges - source: public domain 4) Russia wanted Trump to win - source: Putin 5) Mueller is a Republican - source: public domain Here is what we have established on a different side: 1) Hillary Clinton is crooked - source: A lot of people are saying it 2) The FISA warrants were unwarranted - source: unknown, but obvious 3) A law enforcement investigator didn't like the perp he was investigating - source: Strozk 4) A certain perp doesn't like the people investigating him - source: deduced from Trump's communiques 5) THERE WAS NO COLLUSION - source - Trump 6) Putin said he didn't do it. - source - Trump Left out one other fact.Thumper and Bambi are real life characters. Source. Disney 1 TBar1977 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,953 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 (edited) Trump won. Get over it. Sources: The Electoral College, The 2016 Election Edited July 24, 2018 by TBar1977 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TobusRex 2,021 Report post Posted July 24, 2018 I'm not worried about Trump. He'll be out of office by Christmas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
