TBar1977 3,760 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) Deakin had the TD with what seemed like 3 seconds left. Wow. Waived off. Edited March 23, 2019 by TBar1977 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lost 106 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Deakin clearly had 2 there, can't believe that didn't get overturned Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
russelscout 1,573 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, TBar1977 said: Deakin had the TD with what seemed like 3 seconds left. Yeah... I dont think they got that right... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pamela 1,334 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, TBar1977 said: Deakin had the TD with what seemed like 3 seconds left. Absolutely, they should have called it sooner than they did. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VakAttack 2,600 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Yeah, not sure how they didn't give.that TD to Deakin.Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VakAttack 2,600 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Wrong guy won. Happy for Kaleb though.Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
russelscout 1,573 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 That was a gift from the refs. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perry 1,175 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 What horrid officiating this year Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LJB 1,453 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 only thing i can figure is the refs are insanely jealous of storniolo's amazing hair... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pamela 1,334 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Sucks Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lost 106 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 That's garbage... I can understand missing it during the course of action, but when you get a slowmo replay how on earth do you not call that? That wasn't even controversial. 100% 2 and control before the end of period scramble where they awarded 2 after time expired. NW coach with the right challenge and refs with a blown call Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigTenFanboy 1,710 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Similar to the Hidlay no takedown. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
russelscout 1,573 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, Perry said: What horrid officiating this year I thought the reviews were suppose to make things better not worse. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,760 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Yeah, wrong guy won. Feel bad for Deakin. It is what it is. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pamela 1,334 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Sounds like they only reviewed the TD call, and not like 5 seconds before when Deakin had the takedown but it wasn't called? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lost 106 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 1 minute ago, BigTenFanboy said: Similar to the Hidlay no takedown. I thought that was a TD too but this was way more clear cut. The Hidlay one was a split second hands down thing. Deakin had control for a full 2-3 seconds here Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,760 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Can Marstellar finally solve the Wick equation? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perry 1,175 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Why do we even have video review.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gromit 420 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 they need to move to a video review committee, it's ridiculous that these guys are reviewing their own bad calls Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pamela 1,334 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, Perry said: Why do we even have video review.. Yes, video review sucks! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lost 106 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Just now, pamela said: Sounds like they only reviewed the TD call, and not like 5 seconds before when Deakin had the takedown but it wasn't called? Yes, but then Storniolo challenged specifically that and they went back and watched it and still didn't call. I'm baffled. This wasn't a judgement call where you could argue it going a different way. There have been some other bad calls this tournament but I can usually at least see the argument for the other side. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBar1977 3,760 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 (edited) I think they reviewed the one that happened right at the buzzer. Not sure if they even looked at the earlier position. If they looked at the earlier one and didn't see it, then I am confused. Edited March 23, 2019 by TBar1977 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VakAttack 2,600 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 Sounds like they only reviewed the TD call, and not like 5 seconds before when Deakin had the takedown but it wasn't called?They said initially that's what they reviewed, but then reviewed the rest after Storniolo challenged.Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BamaGrappler 35 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 17 minutes ago, pamela said: Haha that was my initial reaction. I thought Bama goes by "UA" whereas Arkansas/Arizona are UofA? ...actually, it is regionally preferred as tUofA... ;-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
newuser69 14 Report post Posted March 23, 2019 The refs on the mat should not handle their own video reviews. They are biased innately. Why not just have a complete 3rd party do all the reviews? All they see is the action without context and make a call. Wouldn't even be hard to do this. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
