Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Lurker

Now that the appeal is over

Recommended Posts

What bombshell controversy awaits us Saturday that we can argue over ad nauseum until Yianni and Zain wrestle again?  Predictions (not match predictions, controversy to get the board riled up predictions)? Go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of match 3, there's a scramble that results in Ringer leading on criteria, but Dake has a strong argument for the points. Koll throws the brick, but does so 8 seconds after points go on the board. The challenge is denied due to an overly literal interpretation of the 5 second rule as a reaction to the arbitration decision. Penn State fans rejoice after Koll receives his "comeuppance."

Edited by qc8223

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, qc8223 said:

At the end of match 3, there's a scramble that results in Ringer leading on criteria, but Dake has a strong argument for the points. Koll throws the brick, but does so 8 seconds after points go on the board. The challenge is denied due to an overly literal interpretation of the 5 second rule as a reaction to the arbitration decision. Penn State fans rejoice after Koll receives his "comeuppance."

Now that would make for some serious fun around here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, qc8223 said:

At the end of match 3, there's a scramble that results in Ringer leading on criteria, but Dake has a strong argument for the points. Koll throws the brick, but does so 8 seconds after points go on the board. The challenge is denied due to an overly literal interpretation of the 5 second rule as a reaction to the arbitration decision. Penn State fans rejoice after Koll receives his "comeuppance."

that would be wild because the koll/yianni argument was for the most literal textualist reading of the five second challenge rule. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yanni is going to STEAMROLL Zain in the 2nd and 3rd match because of that ankle. At the end of the 3rd Cael is going to throw the brick in claiming "UNNECESSARY ROUGHNESS!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, qc8223 said:

At the end of match 3, there's a scramble that results in Ringer leading on criteria, but Dake has a strong argument for the points. Koll throws the brick, but does so 8 seconds after points go on the board. The challenge is denied due to an overly literal interpretation of the 5 second rule as a reaction to the arbitration decision. Penn State fans rejoice after Koll receives his "comeuppance."

But!!!! Koll looked at the brick at 5seconds and began reaching for it.  He then reached for, and grabbed the brick.  He then pulled his arm back moved it forward grabbed the brick had 3 seconds of hangtime. So in actually the process of brick throwing started at 5 seconds. :. )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...