Jump to content

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Taylor beat Sharifov 12-2. Cox us 0-2 against him and Snyder 0-1.

Dake is 452-1(he lost freshman year in HS or some crap) against Taylor.

Burroughs is 86-1 against Dake.

So.

JB

Dake

Taylor

Cox

Snyder

Cox is 2-1 vs dake and taylor. Both are beneath him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Taylor beat Sharifov 12-2. Cox us 0-2 against him and Snyder 0-1.
Dake is 452-1(he lost freshman year in HS or some crap) against Taylor.
Burroughs is 86-1 against Dake.
So.
JB
Dake
Taylor
Cox
Snyder
....at 86 kg.

Sharfivov is a different wrestler at 97 kg.

Although he did beat Cael 8/2 @ 84 in 2011.



Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Perry said:

Cox is 2-1 vs dake and taylor. Both are beneath him.

 

7 minutes ago, cjc007 said:

....at 86 kg.

Sharfivov is a different wrestler at 97 kg.

Although he did beat Cael 8/2 @ 84 in 2011.



Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk
 

Guys.. I was joking..

My breakdown is middle of Page 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I swear p4p arguments are like. Who's better Santa or the Easter Bunny..

 

Poster 1: Santa breaks into your house and leaves you gifts...

 

Poster 2: yeah so do rats.... but can you show me another rabbit that lays eggs

 

WrestlingNerd: devils advocate, why arent we including Cupid cause he does spread love for Valentines day, and one could argue that both these holidays center around love.

 

Posters 3,4,5: something involving PSU

 

P4P is as unresolvable as "Is autism an issue or is Desanto just a jerk".... democrats/republicans... pineapple on pizza... its all to taste... now stop it you weirdos

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Lurker said:

That's the beauty of it, everyone has their own particular "what weighs more".  Of course there's no way to be objective about it (with the exception of those that have actually wrestled).  Doesn't mean someone's list has to show bias, just shows what counts for more with each individual (although in some cases bias is sure to come into play).

I think in this crop of talent, it’s literally impossible to be anything but biased in this kind of ranking. Biased isn’t necessarily bad for these meaningless lists only nerds like us care about. But it is bias, plain and simple. What objective and reasonable criteria can you come up with that will generate a clear, objective ranking from this year’s men’s team? You can’t. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...