Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Pick the outstanding wrestler of these two

Recommended Posts

Four matches in the tournament.

Wrestler 1 (seeded #3):

Match 1 (unseeded):  12-1 MD, 3:34 RT (gave up escape)

Match 2 (#6 seed):  9-0 MD, 3:06 RT

Match 3 (#2 seed):  8-2, -:19 RT (gave up reverse)

Final (#1 seed):  7-0, 3:02 RT

Wrestler 2 (seeded #2):

Match 1 (unseeded):  16-1 TF @4:36, 3:16 RT at the time (gave up escape)

Match 2 (#7 seed):  Fall @ 1:28,  1:22 RT at the time

Match 3 (#6 seed):  6-1, 4:07 RT (gave up a penalty point)

Final (#5 seed who beat #1 seed):  11-0 MD, 4:53 RT

Wrestler 2 was either neutral or on top the entire tournament:  nobody with a choice took down for obvious reasons. 13:38 RT in 20:04 of wrestling.

(yes, I'm bored)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Guess I should have figured it was a Cornell guy (Darmstadt) not getting it in favor of another school (Humphreys).

Darmstadt didn’t have to beat any top ~15 guys to win.   Humphreys beat 2.

The #1 guy couldn't make it to the finals, and perhaps the seeding of Humphreys was wrong.  Is that Darmstadt's fault?  Who was more dominant in the matches they actually had?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...