BigTenFanboy 1,790 Report post Posted March 30, 2020 https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/6742208-ncaa-extends-eligibility-of-spring-denies-winter-sports?utm_source=newsletter&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_medium=email Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DocBZ 194 Report post Posted March 30, 2020 NCAA are bunch of fuggin morons 2 TexRef and Erminio8 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marcus Cisero 342 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 11 minutes ago, BigTenFanboy said: https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/6742208-ncaa-extends-eligibility-of-spring-denies-winter-sports?utm_source=newsletter&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_medium=email sorry bigten - I just posted a similar thread and just noticed yours. Sorry about that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrestleknownothing 1,519 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 I wonder what this means, if anything for Olympic redshirts. This decision was by the Division 1 Council. The ability to stop the 5 year clock is up to the "Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement, or a committee designated by it". Do they grant an additional clock stoppage or no? Â Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AHamilton 1,026 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 Reportedly, most coaches were (selfishly) against another year of eligibility. Brands and Ryan were for getting another year. Maybe Cael, too (but he is pretty tight lipped about a lot of stuff.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletcher 1,109 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 Moore can officially enter the conversation of the best to never win a title. 6 Ohio Elite, Schuteandscore, MDogg and 3 others reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sheerstress 174 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 Was there any talk as to whether athletes with a redshirt year remaining might be able to apply it? Or did they simply say that everyone loses a year regardless? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kyleinthecircle 8 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 really not sure why anybody thought the NCAA would give an entire season of eligibility back to athletes who had a single tournament canceled 3 CoachWrestling, cjc007 and Bozak2018 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dougb 53 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 They should just let ANY Student who takes a Full Class Schedule (Usually 12 Units) Compete as many years as they want (Maybe have a maximum of 4 years on scholarship) If they are Financially able to do it why not? You get a great workout, have fun and improve, some will be late bloomers, maybe pretty good at age 18, but incredible in late 20's or early 30's, eventually have someone win 10-15 or more NCAA titles, Have  College Wrestling Versions of Boxers George Foreman and Bernard Hopkins winning titles at age 40's to 50's,  Not going to happen, but it would be great. 1 1 TexRef and leshismore reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cjc007 774 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 They should just let ANY Student who takes a Full Class Schedule (Usually 12 Units) Compete as many years as they want (Maybe have a maximum of 4 years on scholarship) If they are Financially able to do it why not? You get a great workout, have fun and improve, some will be late bloomers, maybe pretty good at age 18, but incredible in late 20's or early 30's, eventually have someone win 10-15 or more NCAA titles, Have  College Wrestling Versions of Boxers George Foreman and Bernard Hopkins winning titles at age 40's to 50's,  Not going to happen, but it would be great.Yeah, that's it. Great idea. Sent from my moto z3 using Tapatalk 1 1 LHU125 and TexRef reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marcus Cisero 342 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 I'm glad this is finally put to bed. Now imagine the excitement surrounding the sport in November. Can't wait! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1032004 1,466 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 So does this decision give any weight to the argument to have a dual team champion? 1 TexRef reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jon 158 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, 1032004 said: So does this decision give any weight to the argument to have a dual team champion? For this screwy season: Decision gives weight to ideas for treating other events (e.g., Midlands) as opportunities for de facto championship. In general: On one hand, dual team championship has always been intriguing. On another hand, It's a shame NCAA must be the one that sanctions it. Â Edited March 31, 2020 by jon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marcus Cisero 342 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 1 minute ago, 1032004 said: So does this decision give any weight to the argument to have a dual team champion? has anyone proposed that? Coach's, wrestlers - I haven't read anything about that at all. In fact I would be surprised if someone did raise that question. I'm willing to bet the teams and wrestlers are way past the tourney cancellation and now with the recent decision on winter sports by the NCAA there's nothing else to discuss. Time to move on fellas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletcher 1,109 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 1 hour ago, 1032004 said: So does this decision give any weight to the argument to have a dual team champion? Part of the NCAAs announcement was that every time there's a 100-year pandemic, there will be a dual team champion. 1 2 Yellow_Medal, Bozak2018 and leshismore reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ching 180 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 I would like to see the coaches vote on AA's (or give them to the top eight seeds), but in no order to them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletcher 1,109 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 8 hours ago, kyleinthecircle said: really not sure why anybody thought the NCAA would give an entire season of eligibility back to athletes who had a single tournament canceled You're saying this is the same as if the Midlands were canceled? I agree this may be how non-wrestling people view it. 2 Ohio Elite and jon reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1032004 1,466 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 29 minutes ago, Marcus Cisero said: has anyone proposed that? Coach's, wrestlers - I haven't read anything about that at all. In fact I would be surprised if someone did raise that question. I'm willing to bet the teams and wrestlers are way past the tourney cancellation and now with the recent decision on winter sports by the NCAA there's nothing else to discuss. Time to move on fellas. There are plenty of coaches that have expressed the desire for a dual team champion, prior to the cancellation of NCAA's.  NCAA's being canceled would only increase that desire IMO. I don't see why it wouldn't at least be a consideration. So many always say "NCAA's are all that matters."  Well this year, there were no NCAA's so essentially the season didn't matter.  If there was a team dual champion, at least it would have mattered for the team title. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinnum 840 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 19 minutes ago, Fletcher said: You're saying this is the same as if the Midlands were canceled? I agree this may be how non-wrestling people view it. The season was cancelled after the conference tournaments.  The whole regular season had finished.  There is roughly 2,500 D1 wrestlers this year.  Only 330 were still competing.  That’s only 12.5%.  Athletes got their season. They simply didn’t get a national championship.   It is unfortunate.  But there is no remedy that is just.  We must move on.  Sometimes life isn’t fair. 2 TFBJR and Full Nelson reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ogalthorpe Haywood 399 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 Unfortunately this was the right decision, it sucks for the 330 individuals that missed out but the chaos that would have come from granting another year would have many other consequences. 3 nom, Marcus Cisero and Show_Me reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletcher 1,109 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 1 hour ago, Pinnum said: The season was cancelled after the conference tournaments.  The whole regular season had finished.  There is roughly 2,500 D1 wrestlers this year.  Only 330 were still competing.  That’s only 12.5%.  Athletes got their season. They simply didn’t get a national championship.   It is unfortunate.  But there is no remedy that is just.  We must move on.  Sometimes life isn’t fair. You're changing the subject. I was responding to OP, who says the NCAA tourney is just another tourney. I disagree - it's far more important than other in-season tourneys. If you disagree with that, I'd say you don't follow the sport. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fletcher 1,109 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 1 hour ago, Ogalthorpe Haywood said: Unfortunately this was the right decision, it sucks for the 330 individuals that missed out but the chaos that would have come from granting another year would have many other consequences. It would have been a logistical nightmare to account for athletic eligibility, scholarship management, how to address graduating seniors, etc. for all winter sport athletes (not just wrestling). If they had allowed it though, the NCAA tourney next year - with returning seniors plus returning Oly redshirts - would have been awesome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IronChef 1,103 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 2 hours ago, 1032004 said: So does this decision give any weight to the argument to have a dual team champion? No. There are arguments for and against a dual champion. This cancellation is entirely separate from that discussion. 1 BLT reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IronChef 1,103 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 8 minutes ago, Fletcher said: I was responding to OP, who says the NCAA tourney is just another tourney. Nobody, including OP, said anything of the sort. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MSU158 2,012 Report post Posted March 31, 2020 1 hour ago, Pinnum said: The season was cancelled after the conference tournaments.  The whole regular season had finished.  There is roughly 2,500 D1 wrestlers this year.  Only 330 were still competing.  That’s only 12.5%.  Athletes got their season. They simply didn’t get a national championship.   It is unfortunate.  But there is no remedy that is just.  We must move on.  Sometimes life isn’t fair. But, the way wrestling is structured, it can be argued that they truly did NOT get their season. In fact, this year was a big example of the NCAA Tournament being basically all that matters with so many top wrestlers wresting so few matches.  Hell, if not for the RPI mandatory match limit, many top guys wouldn’t have even had 15 matches after their conference championships.  This was especially true of Iowa and PSU’s schedule. I am not saying that they definitively deserve a full season, I would advocate for 1 semester, but I do believe the qualifying wrestlers have as strong of an argument as possible out of every sport eligible. So much is decided by that last tournament for individual status, while a sport like basketball picks its AA’s The same way they would regardless. I said earlier that it was too much of a logistical nightmare for it too happen, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think it should have. 1 jon reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites