Jump to content
Lunaticfringe

Vaccination retirement

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

...Because of the vaccine.   Multiple studies have concluded it is actually more deadly.   Many countries with little vaccine coverage have recently seen their highest daily deaths of the entire pandemic.

What studies? I just did a search and perused a few articles and they all say the same thing... delta is more transmissible but less severe (as in less than even a typical flu), without regard to vaccination status 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, pawrestler said:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00474-6/fulltext
 

this is a nice summary by the editors on the recent study showing delta has about a 2x risk of hospitalization for unvaxxed

Well, I guess we’ve established that there is conflicting information getting out from various mainstream sources.... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, vegetable lasagna said:

Well, I guess we’ve established that there is conflicting information getting out from various mainstream sources.... 

So what’s your source for it being less deadly?

...thanks pawrestler for the links

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

So what’s your source for it being less deadly?

...thanks pawrestler for the links

That info has been out and pretty common knowledge for some time but we don't know what the next mutation could bring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ionel said:

That info has been out and pretty common knowledge for some time but we don't know what the next mutation could bring.

But again, the only reason it appears "less deadly" is because of the vaccine.  It's not less deadly in countries without the vaccine

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

But again, the only reason it appears "less deadly" is because of the vaccine.  It's not less deadly in countries without the vaccine

Do you have reference: hospital rate &/or death rate of unvaccinted from delta?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, ionel said:

Do you have reference: hospital rate &/or death rate of unvaccinted from delta?

The Lancet study I linked a few posts back is the most definitive re: hospitalization rate for unvaxxed due to delta finding a 2x of alpha. That study only went through May 21 and didn’t look at death rate. These big tens of thousands of individuals studies are the gold standard but obviously take time etc; definitively there haven’t been studies like that focused on death rate yet. There are Medrxiv studies that are finding higher death rates with delta which I believe, but it’s better to wait for big studies that have done peer review etc. I’m sure given the recent uptick in mortality these studies will be out soon, unfortunately. 

Edited by pawrestler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/28/2021 at 12:43 AM, Red53 said:

I'll bite on why I am "antivax" in regards to Covid for those that are curious as to how one could reach this conclusion. It all starts with the Bayesian priors- I don't trust Big Pharma, I lack faith in the Federal Government, I can't trust a media that has thrown away the shackles of unbiased journalism in favor of activism, I have seen way too many new technologies fail to live up the test of time, and my immune system hasn't failed me yet. From that starting point, it's a big hill to climb. I am less skeptical than I was 6 months ago, but still happily in the control group on this grand experiment and currently recovering without issue. 

Interesting, thanks for sharing at least. Is there any reason why you also don’t trust medical professionals and science?

I’m not judging you just trying to find out why someone doesn’t trust recommendations of medical professionals and scientists who go through not only incredible rigorous education and who also deal with scientifically proven facts through a peer reviewed system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wamba,

This is why there is a debate...because of these medical professionals and science.  

3 hours ago, wamba said:

Interesting, thanks for sharing at least. Is there any reason why you also don’t trust medical professionals and science?

I’m not judging you just trying to find out why someone doesn’t trust recommendations of medical professionals and scientists who go through not only incredible rigorous education and who also deal with scientifically proven facts through a peer reviewed system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWBC-JX6lsg

https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.52/r9v.b25.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CovidPatientTreatmentGuide-TFH-7-31-2021.pdf

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, John Morgan said:

Interesting. In the youtube video, at 6:10 - the speaker explains that once you have had Covid, that you can never get it again. that it's a "one and done" disease.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, John Morgan said:

Against my better judgment what are these supposed to prove? 

The ‘The Truth for Health Foundation’ gets a number of things wrong in the vaccine section alone:

‘the vaccine doesn’t protect against variants’ is false 

’no reduced spread’ is certainly debatable 

‘no reduced hospitalizations or deaths’ is false 

They hammer home ‘it’s experimental / not FDA’ approved but then talk about Regeron as an alternative (despite being experimental) and now Pfizer is approved….

They seem to have very little knowledge of the mRNA vaccine research at least recently. Comparing AIDS and covid isn’t really apples to apples.

There isn’t really anything cited in this at all either just broad statements…

The doctors cited in this don’t seem to have any research program — a foot and ankle doctor shouldn’t be cited as a vaccine or IDD expert. 

I find it kinda fascinating that one of the skepticisms against the vaccine is that you can’t hold the makers responsible yet here we are with a 20 pdf riddled no citations and really no expertise on the topic with errors giving advice…

Most amazing to me is this document discourages vaccination yet the vast majority of their advantages to home care are actually achieved with the vaccine, definitively! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, pawrestler said:

Against my better judgment what are these supposed to prove? 

The ‘The Truth for Health Foundation’ gets a number of things wrong in the vaccine section alone:

‘the vaccine doesn’t protect against variants’ is false 

’no reduced spread’ is certainly debatable 

‘no reduced hospitalizations or deaths’ is false 

They hammer home ‘it’s experimental / not FDA’ approved but then talk about Regeron as an alternative (despite being experimental) and now Pfizer is approved….

They seem to have very little knowledge of the mRNA vaccine research at least recently. Comparing AIDS and covid isn’t really apples to apples.

There isn’t really anything cited in this at all either just broad statements…

The doctors cited in this don’t seem to have any research program — a foot and ankle doctor shouldn’t be cited as a vaccine or IDD expert. 

I find it kinda fascinating that one of the skepticisms against the vaccine is that you can’t hold the makers responsible yet here we are with a 20 pdf riddled no citations and really no expertise on the topic with errors giving advice…

Most amazing to me is this document discourages vaccination yet the vast majority of their advantages to home care are actually achieved with the vaccine, definitively! 

My post is in relation to your comment to another poster..."Is there any reason why you also don’t trust medical professionals and science?"   The interview is by Dr. Johnson interviewing Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA Internist, Cardiologist, and Epidemiologist.   They are medical professionals referencing science.  Feel free to research and listen to Dr. McCullough in multiple interviews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, John Morgan said:

My post is in relation to your comment to another poster..."Is there any reason why you also don’t trust medical professionals and science?"   The interview is by Dr. Johnson interviewing Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FCCP, FAHA, FNKF, FNLA, FCRSA Internist, Cardiologist, and Epidemiologist.   They are medical professionals referencing science.  Feel free to research and listen to Dr. McCullough in multiple interviews.

Sorry, meant my posts to be for Wamba.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John Morgan said:

Yes, would “truth for health” and “real news network” be wrong?? No way, at least not based off of their names. Man, I was an idiot for believing the FDA, NIH, and scientists/physicians from Harvard, MIT, etc when all along I should have just checked “real news.” 
 

It reminds me of how I used to copy my answers off of my friends in school. The teacher said we were wrong, and that the kids who ended up going to better colleges were right, but i guess now it turns out that I was in fact correct.

Edited by Billyhoyle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...