flyingcement 747 Report post Posted January 3 To add to what others have already said. I would change the outcome then with Courtney earning a decision over Medley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ionel 2,427 Report post Posted January 3 6 minutes ago, flyingcement said: To add to what others have already said. I would change the outcome then with Courtney earning a decision over Medley Why was Michigan silent on this? Asking for a friend from New Jersey. 1 2 flyingcement, VakAttack and dman115 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bardamu911 82 Report post Posted January 3 2 hours ago, hammerlockthree said: is this a joke? dead serious bruh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,581 Report post Posted January 3 (edited) 13 minutes ago, ionel said: Why was Michigan silent on this? Asking for a friend from New Jersey. Pyles is such a tool.....jock sniffer was that the word? Edited January 3 by hammerlockthree Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RegularStalling 52 Report post Posted January 3 (edited) Don’t expect Parco to be out there for ASU. That being the case, I don’t really see a path for them to win the dual. Parco being replaced with likely Belton is probably a 7 point swing in a match in which they have a razor thin margin of error. Prediction: 25-12, Michigan. Edited January 3 by RegularStalling Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bardamu911 82 Report post Posted January 3 14 minutes ago, RegularStalling said: Don’t expect Parco to be out there for ASU. That being the case, I don’t really see a path for them to win the dual. Parco being replaced with likely Belton is probably a 7 point swing in a match in which they have a razor thin margin of error. Prediction: 25-12, Michigan. what's up with Parco? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 4 hours ago, RegularStalling said: Don’t expect Parco to be out there for ASU. That being the case, I don’t really see a path for them to win the dual. Parco being replaced with likely Belton is probably a 7 point swing in a match in which they have a razor thin margin of error. Prediction: 25-12, Michigan. False. 6 point swing at best. Storr will only win via Decision. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Housebuye 2,417 Report post Posted January 3 Schultz is in Austin 1 nhs67 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 1 hour ago, Housebuye said: Schultz is in Austin YES! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 So it is looking like we only have each team down one starter then? No excuses when one wins as to 'so and so was out' or whatever the cool kids are saying nowadays? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fadzaev2 545 Report post Posted January 3 As we go into this match, still wonder why Schultz didn't wrestle Kirkvliet in their dual....didn't make sense to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
treep2000 1,124 Report post Posted January 3 I'm predicting a few more ducks... I hope they don't come true and we actually get to see these matches, but I'm not overly optimistic right now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mphillips 1,651 Report post Posted January 3 7 hours ago, Housebuye said: Schultz is in Austin Only came for the tacos. 1 BerniePragle reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 27 minutes ago, Mphillips said: Only came for the tacos. I am surprisingly okay with this, being as large a fan of tacos as I am wrestling, myself. 1 WresFan89 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ionel 2,427 Report post Posted January 3 18 minutes ago, nhs67 said: I am surprisingly okay with this, being as large a fan of tacos as I am wrestling, myself. Your avatar image has that look of: I just ate a taco. :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evco 0 Report post Posted January 3 (edited) Is Nick wrestling? they don’t have it listed at 125. Does anybody have any insight into that? Edited January 3 by Evco I found out the answer right here above from cp Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,581 Report post Posted January 3 50 minutes ago, Mphillips said: Only came for the tacos. he was in Niceville FL, too, but they only put him out against hofstra. Does it make any sense that they would only put him out to win the duel? Do they care or not? Maybe the idea is that they think he'll have to be beat Parris to get a top 2/3 seed? But assumed they could duck kerkviliet and still get seeded above him? If he ducks Kerk and Parris and rolls into NCAAs undefeated will that keep him on the other side from Gable? Can't help but think so. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 11 minutes ago, ionel said: Your avatar image has that look of: I just ate a taco. :) I am, admittedly, at least a few pounds above my competition weight of 167. It has been nearly 30 years, so being under 30lbs over that provides me some sort of joy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sheerstress 168 Report post Posted January 3 https://mgoblue.com/news/2022/1/2/wrestling-wolverines-to-ring-in-2022-with-non-conference-slate-vs-no-6-asu-in-austin.aspx Looks like all the seniors to be present except Suriano. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
juniorvarsity 10 Report post Posted January 3 19 hours ago, flyingcement said: To add to what others have already said. I would change the outcome then with Courtney earning a decision over Medley Flo wrote an article on December 29th titled "Why Nick Suriano's Debut Against ASU Is So Important" but they tweeted that he is not competing in the dual one day before. They included him in their hype video too. They knew just like many of us did that he would not be competing. I mean, if I knew he was not going to compete, then they surely knew that the admissions process for second quarter would not be done before the dual. This type of stuff annoys me. I think they did something similar for the RTC duals and a ton of people the hyped for matchups did not show. I could be confused on the event, but this is not a new way they have misled. It is just like, just be honest Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NJW 20 Report post Posted January 3 (edited) This sucks Edited January 3 by NJW Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nhs67 1,952 Report post Posted January 3 So UofM has a 36 point hesd start. Great. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sheerstress 168 Report post Posted January 3 Yes, I guess better than nothing. Oh well.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1032004 1,405 Report post Posted January 3 1 minute ago, nhs67 said: So UofM has a 36 point hesd start. Great. It doesn’t sound like it’s going to count as a dual. Just 4 “extra matches” basically Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
