Jimmy Cinnabon 411 Report post Posted March 19 Gable is Gable but Schultz might be the only heavy who has to cut to make 285. Kerk got in on Gable's legs a few times but couldn't finish. Schultz has no leg attacks but can throw. I still think Gable wins comfortably with go behinds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShakaAloha 427 Report post Posted March 19 No 1 Weems reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubs 6 Report post Posted March 19 Of course not. I'm eagerly awaiting your next update and analysis on the current team favorite, though. What ya got? 1 Eagle26 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,635 Report post Posted March 19 idk i hear if you underhook steveson and push him around he's clueless. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
portajohn 441 Report post Posted March 19 I love how you follow up a dumb thread with an even dumber thread. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ImNotSmart 3 Report post Posted March 19 No. Not with 24 hours between matches. He will be back to full strength by tomorrow. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
treep2000 1,140 Report post Posted March 19 No. We just saw the national championship match and it was Gable vs. Kerk. Gable is going to tech Schultz. 1 Le duke reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GreatWhiteNorth 538 Report post Posted March 19 18 minutes ago, hammerlockthree said: idk i hear if you underhook steveson and push him around he's clueless. Whoa, now this is clueless, as a post I mean - HL3, this seems out of form for you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mphillips 1,738 Report post Posted March 19 Just now, GreatWhiteNorth said: Whoa, now this is clueless, as a post I mean - HL3, this seems out of form for you. Seriously? You don't sense sarcasm... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GreatWhiteNorth 538 Report post Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Mphillips said: Seriously? You don't sense sarcasm... Depends on the author and depends on how well the sarcasm is executed. Sarcasm can be done well and not so well. It's a sliding scale. In this case... nope, don't see it. Feel free to explain. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ImNotSmart 3 Report post Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said: Depends on the author and depends on how well the sarcasm is executed. Sarcasm can be done well and not so well. It's a sliding scale. In this case... nope, don't see it. Feel free to explain. I got the sarcasm………… Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mphillips 1,738 Report post Posted March 19 I wouldn't believe that HL3 believes that for a second. He knows Gable goes right by the underhook. Right? 1 GreatWhiteNorth reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GreatWhiteNorth 538 Report post Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Mphillips said: I wouldn't believe that HL3 believes that for a second. He knows Gable goes right by the underhook. Right? That's on me. I read it fast and missed the "I hear" part. Still watching replays and posting while watching. HL3 posts some nutty stuff sometimes, but this was sarcasm. My mistake. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mphillips 1,738 Report post Posted March 19 1 minute ago, GreatWhiteNorth said: That's on me. I read it fast and missed the "I hear" part. Still watching replays and posting while watching. HL3 posts some nutty stuff sometimes, but this was sarcasm. My mistake. Interesting. I don't find his post' nutty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GreatWhiteNorth 538 Report post Posted March 19 Just now, Mphillips said: Interesting. I don't find his post' nutty. I do - sometimes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,635 Report post Posted March 19 it was an ironic remark on my part. Lets move on. 1 GreatWhiteNorth reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
de4856 371 Report post Posted March 19 So after watching Schultz beat Parris, I wonder how Schultz would do against Gwizz in Freestyle. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Better Call Stall 75 Report post Posted March 19 Nope. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nickp 23 Report post Posted March 19 Schultz makes for an interesting matchup for Gable Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flyingcement 829 Report post Posted March 19 Probably a pin by Gable Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
portajohn 441 Report post Posted March 19 8 minutes ago, nickp said: Schultz makes for an interesting matchup for Gable Like a practice dummy? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TripNSweep 765 Report post Posted March 19 I think Schultz's only chance is to go feet to back. That said if there is any heavyweight in the field who can do that, it's him. Schultz catches Gable and pancakes him for the fall. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swoopdown 628 Report post Posted March 19 I think DeSanto takes this one faux pastry. He's on fire. * You heard it here. *sarcasm alert Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Idaho 1,346 Report post Posted March 19 8 hours ago, Mphillips said: Interesting. I don't find his post' nutty. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
