Casper 106 Report post Posted March 24 Cael & his staff are #1 this year. Don't know if they would do as well without Cael to lead it all - but I don't think they would. Somehow he holds them together - enough so Casey has not left for other offers. Put into perspective - 13 seasons, 9 Titles. If we remove 2020 COVID NoTourney - it is 12 seasons, 9 Titles. Major credit to Cael & HIS STAFF. I doubt Penn State will threaten 9 in a row like Gable had at Iowa. But so far Penn State is doing the job. Overall it it good for Wrestling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp157 547 Report post Posted March 24 1 hour ago, Casper said: Cael & his staff are #1 this year. Don't know if they would do as well without Cael to lead it all - but I don't think they would. Somehow he holds them together - enough so Casey has not left for other offers. Put into perspective - 13 seasons, 9 Titles. If we remove 2020 COVID NoTourney - it is 12 seasons, 9 Titles. Major credit to Cael & HIS STAFF. I doubt Penn State will threaten 9 in a row like Gable had at Iowa. But so far Penn State is doing the job. Overall it it good for Wrestling. I’m not being sarcastic or acerbic.. but how is lack of competitive parity “good” for wrestling 1 Jim L reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrestleknownothing 1,638 Report post Posted March 24 30 minutes ago, jp157 said: I’m not being sarcastic or acerbic.. but how is lack of competitive parity “good” for wrestling Its a good question. I have been thinking about this a lot now that I am looking at wrestling data. Because I am working backward, all of my data is dominated by PSU. I am working to fix that. College wrestling has always been dynastic. One or two teams dominating for long periods. Is it a coincidence that school participation has been shrinking too? Or are those two things related? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drag it 496 Report post Posted March 24 10 hours ago, portajohn said: It was solely to throw some light on & give props to a member of the PSU staff that is and has produced quite a few studs. Cunningham's success seems to go unnoticed to the general wrestling public. True and well worth the post. One thing that makes the situation work so well is I think Casey likes it this way. I saw a Penn State road dual once where the top guys on the team and Cael in particular got mobbed afterwards by the crowd. Cael patiently signed everything put in front of him and posed for every picture and answered questions, but he looked a lot less happy than Casey, who was chatting unnoticed with a friend who was at the meet and then walked right through the crowd and started laughing with Nickal, who had made a getaway, about something in the back hall. (Actually the funniest part to me was that until I stuck a ticket stub in Varner's face to sign, no one had noticed a guy who had the same gold medal at home that Cael does.) 1 portajohn reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billyhoyle 2,488 Report post Posted March 24 5 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Its a good question. I have been thinking about this a lot now that I am looking at wrestling data. Because I am working backward, all of my data is dominated by PSU. I am working to fix that. College wrestling has always been dynastic. One or two teams dominating for long periods. Is it a coincidence that school participation has been shrinking too? Or are those two things related? College football is the same way and is doing just fine. The problem with wrestling is it’s a niche sport. Arkansas football has sucked forever, yet people in Arkansas still go to their games. I guess there’s not much else to do there. Parity isn’t a problem if the product is good. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp157 547 Report post Posted March 24 8 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Its a good question. I have been thinking about this a lot now that I am looking at wrestling data. Because I am working backward, all of my data is dominated by PSU. I am working to fix that. College wrestling has always been dynastic. One or two teams dominating for long periods. Is it a coincidence that school participation has been shrinking too? Or are those two things related? I think the argument that lack of any semblance of competitive parity hasn’t been good, in the big picture. Is very much a strong one. Though honestly discussion about it seems to trigger people Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrestleknownothing 1,638 Report post Posted March 24 2 hours ago, Billyhoyle said: College football is the same way and is doing just fine. The problem with wrestling is it’s a niche sport. Arkansas football has sucked forever, yet people in Arkansas still go to their games. I guess there’s not much else to do there. Parity isn’t a problem if the product is good. College football has had 25 different schools win a national championship since 1997, wrestling has had 5 in the same time. The degrees of dynastic behavior are different. But football is a bad comp for the reason you stated. It is not a niche sport. The right way to look at it is to compare wrestling to other niche sports that are not dominated by a handful of schools. Maybe all niche sports are that way. Not sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp157 547 Report post Posted March 24 3 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said: College football has had 25 different schools win a national championship since 1997, wrestling has had 5 in the same time. The degrees of dynastic behavior are different. But football is a bad comp for the reason you stated. It is not a niche sport. The right way to look at it is to compare wrestling to other niche sports that are not dominated by a handful of schools. Maybe all niche sports are that way. Not sure. But the real question is.. why do people keep assuming wrestling “has” to be a niche sport Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CoachWrestling 436 Report post Posted March 24 (edited) 17 minutes ago, jp157 said: But the real question is.. why do people keep assuming wrestling “has” to be a niche sport The biggest hurdle is that the rules are too hard to understand. And that is not a fixable problem. Edited March 24 by CoachWrestling Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim L 328 Report post Posted March 24 (edited) 1 hour ago, jp157 said: But the real question is.. why do people keep assuming wrestling “has” to be a niche sport Outside of Basketball and Football, and maybe Baseball and Hockey in certain parts of the country, all NCAA sports are niche. Edited March 24 by Jim L Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim L 328 Report post Posted March 24 1 minute ago, Jim L said: Outside of Basketball and Football, and maybe Baseball and Hockey in certain parts of the country, all NCAA sports are niche. Even looking at pro sports, we can add Golf and Tennis, and soccer for the rest of the world, what other sports aren't niche? Every four years, Gymnastics and Figure Skating? Maybe UFC and Boxing Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
southend 243 Report post Posted March 24 3 minutes ago, Jim L said: Outside of Basketball and Football, and maybe Baseball and Hockey in cetain parts of the country, all NCAA sports are niche. You could add swimming, track, and soccer easily to that list , but I see what your saying. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim L 328 Report post Posted March 24 13 minutes ago, southend said: You could add swimming, track, and soccer easily to that list , but I see what your saying. Those sports aren't niche at NCAA levels? Swimming and Track get coverage every Olympic year, and soccer does for the World Cup years I have no clue who the top teams or individuals are in competing at the NCAA level now. Does anyone, who is not a specific fan of one of those sports? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp157 547 Report post Posted March 24 24 minutes ago, Jim L said: Outside of Basketball and Football, and maybe Baseball and Hockey in certain parts of the country, all NCAA sports are niche. But again,why. Every school I know of where wrestling coaches make the effort.. attendance and school popularity is high. Hs and college. Wrestling doesn’t have to be a niche sport. But it makes itself one Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GockeS 548 Report post Posted March 24 (edited) dynastic nature of it has nothing to do with dropping the sport until 2000 i think 5 schools outside the states Iowa and Oklahoma had won a title. fewer before 1972 the schools were dropped due to title IX Edited March 24 by GockeS Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billyhoyle 2,488 Report post Posted March 24 5 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said: College football has had 25 different schools win a national championship since 1997, wrestling has had 5 in the same time. The degrees of dynastic behavior are different. But football is a bad comp for the reason you stated. It is not a niche sport. The right way to look at it is to compare wrestling to other niche sports that are not dominated by a handful of schools. Maybe all niche sports are that way. Not sure. That was then. Now, Alabama wins almost every year. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldcougar 68 Report post Posted March 24 On 3/20/2022 at 4:28 PM, alliseeisgold said: Was in the ncaa finals at cornell and shouldn't of been at penn state if officials make some calls......looks like the same wrestler. Don't see that Cael got him to jump levels You really should send a written objection to the NCAA about Dean, since you are sure that he shouldn't have been in the finals this year. His title should be withdrawn and Penn State disqualified. I feel much better now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GockeS 548 Report post Posted March 24 i agree, the rules can be a problem NFL had and has a problem with 'what is a catch?' we have a problem with 'what is a takedown?' and 'what is stalling?' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wrestleknownothing 1,638 Report post Posted March 24 2 hours ago, Billyhoyle said: That was then. Now, Alabama wins almost every year. 6 different teams in the last 10 years. 4 in the last 4. 1 Mphillips reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jp157 547 Report post Posted March 24 3 hours ago, GockeS said: dynastic nature of it has nothing to do with dropping the sport until 2000 i think 5 schools outside the states Iowa and Oklahoma had won a title. fewer before 1972 the schools were dropped due to title IX Title IX was the excuse not the reason.. it’s pretty easy to pick which out of Mens soccer Mens Tennis, baseball and wrestling to cut.. when the wrestling teams, very often, had the worst grades, and behavior.. add in not “playing politics” by coaches. It wasn’t a hard choice. The continued victim complex, and complete lack of self accountability about this that wrestlers have about this issue always staggers me Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GockeS 548 Report post Posted March 25 (edited) yeah self accountability i remember my AD not allowing me to do something because all wrestling coaches are liars and cheaters yeah... way to perpetuate it jp i agree that it was the excuse but if it didn't exist... how many would have been dropped? some i'm sure, but not the extent that were. and again.. it shouldn't have to exist... but there were a lot more people who were liars and cheaters that weren't wrestling coaches making things bad for womens sports. so dont get all high and mighty on me Edited March 25 by GockeS Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim L 328 Report post Posted March 25 20 hours ago, GockeS said: i agree, the rules can be a problem NFL had and has a problem with 'what is a catch?' we have a problem with 'what is a takedown?' and 'what is stalling?' Explains why nobody watches NFL games Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GockeS 548 Report post Posted March 25 12 minutes ago, Jim L said: Explains why nobody watches NFL games they do. because they like it. those that like wrestling watch wrestling. im just saying the rules aren't really the problem when it comes to new viewership Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swoopdown 631 Report post Posted March 25 I credit this forum for most of Cael's success. Unfortunately, this forum can only recruit and sucks at coaching. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PSUSMC 343 Report post Posted March 25 1 hour ago, swoopdown said: Unfortunately, this forum can only recruit and sucks at coaching. Which is why I brought on Casey Cunningham to post for me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites