Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
IronChef

Cael's full argument against

Recommended Posts

I see Cael's subterfuge work in attempt to keep the status quo, as a bad idea. His methods of antagonizing on twitter is aggressive and akin to this notion of shoving his vision down people's throats.

 

I am glad the committee put this thing up for a vote amongst the coaches. I can live with the majority opinion and have little patience for a loud minority.

Should committee members be voting on proposals they are writing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.... what the hell does a bonus point mean now in the NCAA tournament? Sounds more like a transfer of power agenda than it does a well tested savior of the sport of wrestling.

I really hope, like we all do I'm sure that this doesn't just destroy the sport altogether.

SHP- Even if you believe PSU to be the favorites either way (as I do), it's much, much closer under a dual format.

Good points here. The individual tournament is diminished without a team point system (no need for bonus points). Of course the dual championships "level the playing field". It's another reason why the idea seems a bit self serving, especially when you look at the members of the committee who just can't seem to win a national championship under the current format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My point is since we only want to put emphasis on duals now, individual tournaments really serve no purpose now.

Hey Drama Queen,

Other than the 10 NCAA Titles that will be handed out, I can't think of too many other reasons to have individual tournaments either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see Cael's subterfuge work in attempt to keep the status quo, as a bad idea. His methods of antagonizing on twitter is aggressive and akin to this notion of shoving his vision down people's throats.

 

I am glad the committee put this thing up for a vote amongst the coaches. I can live with the majority opinion and have little patience for a loud minority.

Should committee members be voting on proposals they are writing?

 

 

I'd hope so. If they didn't like the proposal enough to vote for it then they probably shouldn't have proposed it in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see Cael's subterfuge work in attempt to keep the status quo, as a bad idea. His methods of antagonizing on twitter is aggressive and akin to this notion of shoving his vision down people's throats.

 

I am glad the committee put this thing up for a vote amongst the coaches. I can live with the majority opinion and have little patience for a loud minority.

Should committee members be voting on proposals they are writing?

I didn't read the whole thread but one point of clarification. The proposal is a NCAA Wrestling Committee proposal that was written by the NCAA. The proposal was then taken to the NWCA Board of Directors who voted to support the proposal. The proposal was not written by the NWCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...