Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
coach_tracy

Alec Baldwin puts on the Chicken wing w/wrist control

Recommended Posts

95% of the people associated with the "Tea Party" are idiots who don't know any better. Under our current president we've actually spent less than every other administration in the past 30+ years. We're actuially paying the least amount we've had to in taxes since the 1950's.

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/23/facebook-posts/viral-facebook-post-says-barack-obama-has-lowest-s/

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/29/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-tax-rates-are-lowest-1950s-ceos-/

 

Anyone who believes otherwise is an idiot. Or deluded. Or uses fabricated reasons to hate our first African-American president. Here's another fact that you might find interesting. Watching Fox News actually makes you dumber than watching no news at all.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

 

In your face space coyote!

 

Space-Coyote--the-simpsons-pets-and-animals-645841_338_244.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

95% of the people associated with the "Tea Party" are idiots who don't know any better. Under our current president we've actually spent less than every other administration in the past 30+ years. We're actuially paying the least amount we've had to in taxes since the 1950's.

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/23/facebook-posts/viral-facebook-post-says-barack-obama-has-lowest-s/

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/29/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-tax-rates-are-lowest-1950s-ceos-/

 

Anyone who believes otherwise is an idiot. Or deluded. Or uses fabricated reasons to hate our first African-American president. Here's another fact that you might find interesting. Watching Fox News actually makes you dumber than watching no news at all.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

 

In your face space coyote!

 

Space-Coyote--the-simpsons-pets-and-animals-645841_338_244.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

95% of the people associated with the "Tea Party" are idiots who don't know any better. Under our current president we've actually spent less than every other administration in the past 30+ years. We're actuially paying the least amount we've had to in taxes since the 1950's.

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/23/facebook-posts/viral-facebook-post-says-barack-obama-has-lowest-s/

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/29/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-tax-rates-are-lowest-1950s-ceos-/

 

Anyone who believes otherwise is an idiot. Or deluded. Or uses fabricated reasons to hate our first African-American president. Here's another fact that you might find interesting. Watching Fox News actually makes you dumber than watching no news at all.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

 

In your face space coyote!

 

Space-Coyote--the-simpsons-pets-and-animals-645841_338_244.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

95% of the people associated with the "Tea Party" are idiots who don't know any better. Under our current president we've actually spent less than every other administration in the past 30+ years. We're actuially paying the least amount we've had to in taxes since the 1950's.

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/23/facebook-posts/viral-facebook-post-says-barack-obama-has-lowest-s/

 

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/29/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-tax-rates-are-lowest-1950s-ceos-/

 

Anyone who believes otherwise is an idiot. Or deluded. Or uses fabricated reasons to hate our first African-American president. Here's another fact that you might find interesting. Watching Fox News actually makes you dumber than watching no news at all.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

 

In your face space coyote!

 

Space-Coyote--the-simpsons-pets-and-animals-645841_338_244.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohier Administrator,

 

Then search for my comments and proudly post them on here. They were exactly the same then as they are now. You think my views of wealthy corporate welfare weasels and their spoiled kids changes in a year?

 

90% agree with the "tea party," eh? That must be why the big gubment shotdown affected democrats much more than country clubbers, eh? Must also be why they haven't been able to win an election since 2010, eh?

 

And, as for these mild manner "tea party" folks that you choose to affiliate yourself with enjoy! These are from two pages' worth, and I've even added more since. These boys are YOURS, my man. ;)

 

Take your pick. If you need more, I have over three pages of links.

 

• Man Holds Monkey with Obama Sticker http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/11 ... 5246.shtml

• Obama Racist Dollar Bill http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/1 ... 35328.html

• White House Growing Watermelons Email http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/2 ... 70492.html

 

racist-hang-in-there-obama.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And I've stated where that I like Baldwin? I can't stand the Baldwin family as a whole, because the goof who supports wrestling is a country clubber. That, alone, puts them on my poop list. ;)

 

So, you enjoy being affiliated with Sean McVeigh Hannity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ohier Administrator,

 

Then search for my comments and proudly post them on here. They were exactly the same then as they are now. You think my views of wealthy corporate welfare weasels and their spoiled kids changes in a year?

 

90% agree with the "tea party," eh? That must be why the big gubment shotdown affected democrats much more than country clubbers, eh? Must also be why they haven't been able to win an election since 2010, eh?

 

And, as for these mild manner "tea party" folks that you choose to affiliate yourself with enjoy! These are from two pages' worth, and I've even added more since. These boys are YOURS, my man. ;)

 

Take your pick. If you need more, I have over three pages of links.

 

• Man Holds Monkey with Obama Sticker http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/11 ... 5246.shtml

quote]

 

I see, so you take the offensive things that an incredibly small percentage of the people in this group has said, probably a fraction of 1% of them, attribute their statements to the entire group. Nice argument. You don't think I could find liberals/progressives who have said incredibly offensive things? There are 310 million people in this country, so you are going to have people of all political persuasions saying all kinds of things that are offensive.

 

So this is a classic smear tactic, taking what a few have said and branding the entire group with it. Thank you for proving my point.

 

Do you seriously not remember the things that your "boys" said about Bush? That he planned 9/11, for instance? There are prominent liberals like Keith Olbermann (possibly the worst person in the world) on record as saying this. In fact, more than half of Democrats believe that Bush was complicit in 9/11- http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... _knew.html

Other surveys have shown numbers around 40% so this isn't just some groundless study. How nuts is that? Not saying that Bush was a perfect president, but now insane must one be to believe that he would orchestrate the killing of 3,000 Americans for a theoretical political gain? And be able to keep it quiet for 12 years?

 

As for searching for your comments to post them about the Duke rape case, I think we all remember what you said and people reference it all the time for the stunning ignorance of your comments. In my mind, the blind hatred of people for their economic status is pretty much on par with the racism that you liberals are so fixated upon.

 

Please define exactly who "corporate welfare weasels" are, just for our edification? In your world does this refer specifically to those received bailout money like Goldman Sachs (something that I think was a mistake but many democrats, such as Hillary and Barack supported), or to anyone who is has a high income?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, speaking of "corporate welfare weasels", did you see that Hillary Clinton just netted $400,000 making two speeches at Goldman Sachs? http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/36 ... lec-torres

 

Of course that is chump change compared to the $70 million that Al Gore made selling Current TV to Al Jazeera, which of course is funded by big oil (to say nothing of their support of terrorism). Given that his whole platform since the 2000 election has been global warming, which fossil fuels are allegedly the main contributor to, it's difficult to imagine anyone ever topping this level of sheer hypocrisy.

 

The moral of the story is that Progressives like yourself always paint rich people as evil, until they have the opportunity to join their ranks, at which time they turn into "pigs at the trough", willing to do almost anything to cash in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ohier Administrator,

 

Then search for my comments and proudly post them on here. They were exactly the same then as they are now. You think my views of wealthy corporate welfare weasels and their spoiled kids changes in a year?

 

90% agree with the "tea party," eh? That must be why the big gubment shotdown affected democrats much more than country clubbers, eh? Must also be why they haven't been able to win an election since 2010, eh?

 

And, as for these mild manner "tea party" folks that you choose to affiliate yourself with enjoy! These are from two pages' worth, and I've even added more since. These boys are YOURS, my man. ;)

 

Take your pick. If you need more, I have over three pages of links.

 

• Man Holds Monkey with Obama Sticker http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/11 ... 5246.shtml

quote]

 

I see, so you take the offensive things that an incredibly small percentage of the people in this group has said, probably a fraction of 1% of them, attribute their statements to the entire group. Nice argument. You don't think I could find liberals/progressives who have said incredibly offensive things? There are 310 million people in this country, so you are going to have people of all political persuasions saying all kinds of things that are offensive.

 

So this is a classic smear tactic, taking what a few have said and branding the entire group with it. Thank you for proving my point.

 

Do you seriously not remember the things that your "boys" said about Bush? That he planned 9/11, for instance? There are prominent liberals like Keith Olbermann (possibly the worst person in the world) on record as saying this. In fact, more than half of Democrats believe that Bush was complicit in 9/11- http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... _knew.html

Other surveys have shown numbers around 40% so this isn't just some groundless study. How nuts is that? Not saying that Bush was a perfect president, but now insane must one be to believe that he would orchestrate the killing of 3,000 Americans for a theoretical political gain? And be able to keep it quiet for 12 years?

 

As for searching for your comments to post them about the Duke rape case, I think we all remember what you said and people reference it all the time for the stunning ignorance of your comments. In my mind, the blind hatred of people for their economic status is pretty much on par with the racism that you liberals are so fixated upon.

 

Please define exactly who "corporate welfare weasels" are, just for our edification? In your world does this refer specifically to those received bailout money like Goldman Sachs (something that I think was a mistake but many democrats, such as Hillary and Barack supported), or to anyone who is has a high income?

 

 

There's only one point and one point only: you tired to claim that the "tea party" were meek and mild mannered folks being misrepresented. I showed you only three links (I tried to post almost the entire three pages of similar links, but the site doesn't allow me to do that, so if you need more, give me a holler) that showed that they are racists. You still excuse such actions and choose to associate yourself with such actions. Good for you, and good for us democrats. That's why you guys don't win elections any longer.

 

Give me a holler if you need to see more. I would suspect that you do, being that you don't condemn such members of your party and find such actions honorable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ohier Administrator,

 

Then search for my comments and proudly post them on here. They were exactly the same then as they are now. You think my views of wealthy corporate welfare weasels and their spoiled kids changes in a year?

 

90% agree with the "tea party," eh? That must be why the big gubment shotdown affected democrats much more than country clubbers, eh? Must also be why they haven't been able to win an election since 2010, eh?

 

And, as for these mild manner "tea party" folks that you choose to affiliate yourself with enjoy! These are from two pages' worth, and I've even added more since. These boys are YOURS, my man. ;)

 

Take your pick. If you need more, I have over three pages of links.

 

• Man Holds Monkey with Obama Sticker http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/11 ... 5246.shtml

quote]

 

I see, so you take the offensive things that an incredibly small percentage of the people in this group has said, probably a fraction of 1% of them, attribute their statements to the entire group. Nice argument. You don't think I could find liberals/progressives who have said incredibly offensive things? There are 310 million people in this country, so you are going to have people of all political persuasions saying all kinds of things that are offensive.

 

So this is a classic smear tactic, taking what a few have said and branding the entire group with it. Thank you for proving my point.

 

Do you seriously not remember the things that your "boys" said about Bush? That he planned 9/11, for instance? There are prominent liberals like Keith Olbermann (possibly the worst person in the world) on record as saying this. In fact, more than half of Democrats believe that Bush was complicit in 9/11- http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... _knew.html

Other surveys have shown numbers around 40% so this isn't just some groundless study. How nuts is that? Not saying that Bush was a perfect president, but now insane must one be to believe that he would orchestrate the killing of 3,000 Americans for a theoretical political gain? And be able to keep it quiet for 12 years?

 

As for searching for your comments to post them about the Duke rape case, I think we all remember what you said and people reference it all the time for the stunning ignorance of your comments. In my mind, the blind hatred of people for their economic status is pretty much on par with the racism that you liberals are so fixated upon.

 

Please define exactly who "corporate welfare weasels" are, just for our edification? In your world does this refer specifically to those received bailout money like Goldman Sachs (something that I think was a mistake but many democrats, such as Hillary and Barack supported), or to anyone who is has a high income?

 

 

There's only one point and one point only: you tired to claim that the "tea party" were meek and mild mannered folks being misrepresented. I showed you only three links (I tried to post almost the entire three pages of similar links, but the site doesn't allow me to do that, so if you need more, give me a holler) that showed that they are racists. You still excuse such actions and choose to associate yourself with such actions. Good for you, and good for us democrats. That's why you guys don't win elections any longer.

 

Give me a holler if you need to see more. I would suspect that you do, being that you don't condemn such members of your party and find such actions honorable.

 

Wow, what a f#cked up response (par for the course though). Where do I say that I find such actions "honorable"? and "choose to associate myself with such actions". I didn't have to condemn them because it was just understood that these actions are need condemnation. I also did not condemn animal cruelty, bestiality, or terrorism in my post, does that mean I now support those things as well? What I actually said, was that when you have tens of millions of people in any organization, you are going to have some bad apples. What you are doing, is taking the views or actions of a small percentage of a very large group, and attributing them to all. Including me now, apparently.

 

The equivalent of your argument would be saying that if Jerry Sandusky is from Penn State and a pedophile, then everyone from Penn State is now a pedophile. Sounds insane, but that's the exact equivalent of what you are doing here..... (sorry PSU fans for dredging this up). They choose to associate themselves with a group of people from which a pedophile once belonged!

 

The fact that you think you have "won" by producing three links from far left websites that are just looking to smear a group that threatens them, what a small number of a group have done, and thus attribute it to all, is just priceless. 13,000 murders are committed in America every year. We are both Americans. Does that mean we choose to associate ourselves with murderers, and find their actions "honorable"? I didn't see you condemn murder in any of your posts!

 

Done arguing with you though, as I really just think you are mentally ill and don't care to lower myself to conversing with you further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ohier admin,

 

Ok, then let's cut to the chase: do you condemn such actions, or are you going to continue to deny that they actually are real and not "cooked up" by a librul using photoshop? Again, I have nearly three pages of links of such examples of this "small fringe" that no country clubber ever seems to condemn. I find that curious.

 

Another for your viewing pleasure. Should be a good one to show around the water cooler at your skinhead rally. ;)

 

renig.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course I would condemn any racially-based rhetoric. But no matter how many times I say this, you will never get it. You can't control who joins your group. For instance, we can probably assume that members of NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association, in case you don't watch much South Park) are probably socially liberal, favor lenient criminal punishments, and thus, are likely to be democrats. Lets say that NAMBLA endorsed the democratic candidate for president. Would it be remotely fair for me to say that the Democratic party was really just a front for a bunch of boy-lovers? Of course not, but that's exactly what you and unfortunately many others are doing here- If there are 10,000 racist members of the Tea Party, and 10,000,000 in the party, that is one out of a thousand, but you make their views stand for the views of all, which is wildly unfair.

 

The reason it's done, of course, is because their overall point is one that nearly everyone has to agree with. The Tea Party is concerned with the National Debt- which is $17 Trillion (certainly not exclusively Obama or the Dems fault). They think that people soaking the system due to just not wanting to work is a huge issue behind this (Disability, Food Stamps, etc) as is wasteful government spending. I don't see how anyone in their right mind can disagree that these are at least valid concerns, even if you don't like their solutions. That's why the organization exists, not because they were concerned whether the Obamas like to eat Watermelon and Fried Chicken, or whatever you posted in the dumb jokes that somehow prove that all conservatives primary motivation in life is hating people based on their skin color.

 

The other reason you and your liberal friends are playing this card is because Obama has achieved so little in five years. Even the dems are running from his signature achievement of Obamacare now, and his approval just hit 39%. The middle east is on fire, and we've supported the wrong side in pretty much every instance. Assad and Putin just made us their bitch in front of the world in Syria, while Obama dithered and changed course like five times. The economy has been stagnant for five years while we have added 6 trillion to the debt. Then there are the scandals- Benghazi, the IRS, Fast and Furious, etc, to which is answer is always that he didn't know. So, this racial stuff is classic "misdirection".

 

And again, while these things you posted are wrong, at the end of the day, they are just really weak, juvenile, and inappropriate attempts at humor by random nobodies (fried chicken and watermelon, really?). If I look hard enough I can find Democrats who believe the earth is flat. So I guess I don't know why you are so fixated on what a few random nobodies are saying- the internet is an absolute cesspool of people saying all kinds of horrible things- if we had a black conservative president, there would be liberals saying all kinds of horrible and racist things about him, no doubt (again, there are 310 million people in the country). In my mind, none compares to accusations made that Bush was a 9/11 co-conspirator, something that is evidently believed by roughly half of democrats and has been said by prominent liberals.

 

Really, nobody I know gives a damn what color Obama is, except for the libs who use it as a false flag to whip their base into a frenzy. Easier to get people motivated to vote when they believe the other side is in a league with Satan I suppose. But remember that Herman Cain was actually leading in the polls for awhile, until the tidal wave of sexual harassment complaints hit him. I'd support somebody like Ben Carson in a heartbeat, and so would any conservative I know.

 

Ok so I answered your question. Now it's only fair that you answer mine. Who exactly are corporate welfare weasels? And what do you think about Hillary's 400K for two speeches at Goldmann Sachs, and Gore's $70 million in Al-Jazeera fossil fuel cash?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is such a pain. It's one thing to get some silly yucks at Alec Baldwin's expense. It's another to launch into these stupid polemics. Between the gross overstatements, the nasty innuendos, and the cheap shots, nothing here has helped college wrestling one bit.

 

If Jason were still in charge of this forum, he would have (re)moved this thread a long time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ban, be honest, you had some pretty awful things to say regarding the Duke Lacrosse thing. You and I have been getting along so well of late, but you have to admit you and your blind class warfare is offensive.

 

Oh, and is there anything more racist than simply voting for someone due to their race? Blacks supported Obama at a clip nearing 95% nationally. In many districts in Philadelphia, there were thousands of votes cast (probably by about ten people), with NONE going to Romney. If 95% of whites voted for Romney, the media would explode with stories of "how far we need to go" in race relations. When 95% of blacks voted for Obama, the media had a giant orgasm.

 

http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/electi ... ed_12.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ban, be honest, you had some pretty awful things to say regarding the Duke Lacrosse thing. You and I have been getting along so well of late, but you have to admit you and your blind class warfare is offensive.

 

Oh, and is there anything more racist than simply voting for someone due to their race? Blacks supported Obama at a clip nearing 95% nationally. In many districts in Philadelphia, there were thousands of votes cast (probably by about ten people), with NONE going to Romney. If 95% of whites voted for Romney, the media would explode with stories of "how far we need to go" in race relations. When 95% of blacks voted for Obama, the media had a giant orgasm.

 

http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/electi ... ed_12.html

I don't see Ban practicing blind class warfare any more than the rest of us. He's a whole lot more like Hillary than Trotsky. He's a populist when it serves him, just like many of us, Left and Right.

"Is there anything more racist (bigoted) than simply voting for someone due to their race" (class, gender, size, you-fill-in-the-blank)? Yes, voting against someone because of theirs.

 

Now back to coach_tracy's celebrity matchup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...