Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Badger Fan

NCAA Allocations

Recommended Posts

JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

Awww, Ma-aaan! Does that mean if Cael changes his mind again at 149, the NCAA committee has to start ALL OVER!? :evil: ;) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

I'm pretty sure the coaches have to submit who they want to be considered for a ranking and RPI. If they use a different starter than the guy who got ranked/RPI then that allocation is lost. Oklahoma State did that at 197 a couple years ago. I'm sure there are other instances of it as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

I'm pretty sure the coaches have to submit who they want to be considered for a ranking and RPI. If they use a different starter than the guy who got ranked/RPI then that allocation is lost. Oklahoma State did that at 197 a couple years ago. I'm sure there are other instances of it as well.

Ohio State at 149 last year (used Paddock instead of Tessari). Usually, it's done because of injuries, but there are other reasons on occasion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

Awww, Ma-aaan! Does that mean if Cael changes his mind again at 149, the NCAA committee has to start ALL OVER!? :evil: ;) :)

 

Are you capable of making a post about ANYTHING without bringing up Cael/PSU? It really is a bit sad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

Awww, Ma-aaan! Does that mean if Cael changes his mind again at 149, the NCAA committee has to start ALL OVER!? :evil: ;) :)

 

Are you capable of making a post about ANYTHING without bringing up Cael/PSU? It really is a bit sad.

Yes, it does sound like he has Sanderson Derangement Syndrome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JB, do all the coaches have to submit their starters for the conference tournament prior to this release or is the NCAA going off "old" information?

 

Awww, Ma-aaan! Does that mean if Cael changes his mind again at 149, the NCAA committee has to start ALL OVER!?

 

Are you capable of making a post about ANYTHING without bringing up Cael/PSU? It really is a bit sad.

 

Oh, so there is no question about who's going at 149 for PSU? My bad! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SHP or anyone else--the website with the Allocations has the ACC with 2 spots at 157. But if you scroll down to the RPI rankings at 157--ACC has 4 wrestlers in the top 33(one is at 33--so 3 in top 29). How come they only get 2 auto bids. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

---------125-133-141-149-157-165-174-184-197-285-total

ACC--- 43% 29% 71% 57% 29% 29% 43% 57% 71% 57% 49%

B12--- 75% 50% 75% 75% 50% 50% 100% 25% 50% 50% 60%

B1G--- 58% 67% 50% 50% 67% 67% 58% 58% 67% 75% 62%

EIWA- 33% 22% 28% 22% 28% 28% 17% 22% 39% 22% 26%

EWL-- 29% 43% 29% 43% 29% 29% 29% 43% 14% 29% 31%

MAC-- 44% 56% 56% 44% 56% 33% 56% 56% 22% 33% 46%

P12--- 17% 50% 17% 17% 17% 17% 50% 33% 33% 33% 28%

SoCo- 13% 13% 13% 38% 25% 38% 13% 13% 13% 25% 20%

WCC-- 33% 17% 17% 17% 33% 50% 17% 33% 17% 17% 25%

 

crudely formatted table of what percentage of teams in each conference earned a qualifier in each weight. so half the Pac12 wrestlers at 133 will earn a spot in the NCAAs this weekend. and approximately 62% of all the Big 10 wrestlers will earn a spot after that tournament.

 

what would happen if the Big12 174 lbers all took the tournament off and decided to rest up for the NCAAs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SHP or anyone else--the website with the Allocations has the ACC with 2 spots at 157. But if you scroll down to the RPI rankings at 157--ACC has 4 wrestlers in the top 33(one is at 33--so 3 in top 29). How come they only get 2 auto bids. Thanks

Roadkill, working on trying to figure out who got which bids as we speak. Will get back to you in a little bit...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...