Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tightwaist

Welch v. Green match

Recommended Posts

Super exciting match, but can someone decipher the scoring for me in this match? First period is straightforward, but 2nd period gets confusing. Did Green get exposure off of TD to make it 7-6? Then crazy scramble makes score 9-8...at this point I am confused. Someone help

 

http://www.flowrestling.org/coverage/25 ... 1Gqb4y9KSM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stop posting links to matches only available to paid subscribers. Total BS in my opinion.

 

Pretty sure a lot of people are watching US Open via Flo - so while your opinion is that it is BS....The opinion of many is that it is very valid...considering it is a HUGE tourney for US wrestlers and Flo is covering. So while it is your choice to not pay for Flo - I don't think you can tell people to "stop posting" - If the Mat.com forum admins allow it...then it's game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

welch is a blast to watch....

i was matside at this match, and i dont think refs keep good accounting of flurries....

just my opinion.

i've noticed it in other matches also....the refs are extremely "lax" in their approach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Best match of the tournament so far, IMO.

 

I agree with wrestlepsu, the reffing seems very off. A lot of guys have only gotten 2pts on multiple exposures, and the pushout vs takedown/exposure scoring hasn't been consistent at all. It seems like the US refs have taken plays from the FILA refs in hosing the US wrestlers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the problem with freestyle wrestling is the bogus back exposure points.

you roll a guy and you get points ?

the object of wrestling is to put a guy on his back for one second.....not a roll through.

.

so by awarding bogus points for only exposing your back makes scoring very difficult.

especially in scrambles and lifts.

.

it wont change, so you gotta deal with the ridiculousness of it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol....

i was referring to the fact that the refs seem to have a problem

with counting when it comes to back exposures....

so to simplify it for them, do away with the bogus back exposures.

.

evidently some folks only read the last post in a thread.....ugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...