fadzaev2 545 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Confusing people with facts. But that's the way some of us roll these days. Mike McArthur was before JRob....second to Jimmy Haines in '77. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 i know a semantic quarrel when i see one. Kinda like i know peaking. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wrestlingnerd 3,000 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Damion Hahn----------------5,5,1,1 I wonder how he would've done at 197 all four years. Looking at him now and remembering how big he was for freestyle, I can't believe he made 184 for two years. I'm sure he grew a little somewhere in there but still, Hahn is so huge now and he's the same height he was throughout college. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jammen 336 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 I'm not certain of my premise but...Maybe this opinion is just some prejudice i developed... I simplified it for you. 1 jtothep reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 I simplified it for you. So you won't address my argument, and based on your response don't understand it, but you will use my own modesty as an argument against it. Real clever of you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headshuck 2,589 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Treats you right for listening to your anger management therapist. But you're a better man for the most part. 1 hammerlockthree reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Thanks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FATMANROLL 54 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 I would like to see a study on the match points scored by Gophers. To me it seems that as freshemen, the studs score a bunch but as their career winds down they score less and less. 1 hammerlockthree reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jammen 336 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 Is it just me or do Minnesota guys peak as freshmen or sophomores and then wait for people to graduate. It's just you. The only glaring exception i know is Manuel Rivera. And this may be typical of D1 to some extent, but the Minny guys are super impressive as freshmen, and really don't improve from there. Huh? The list of AA's disproves your theory, if that's what it is. Or maybe I could restate it this way, They don't peak as seniors. There is no such thing as "peaking". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,047 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 Kinda like i know peaking. zactly. same way a judge recognizes hardcore pornog. 1 hammerlockthree reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 no one knows what you are talking about. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headshuck 2,589 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 I would like to see a study on the match points scored by Gophers. To me it seems that as freshemen, the studs score a bunch but as their career winds down they score less and less. This is interesting. Please expand your study to include the top teams. Thanks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rossel3 77 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 This is interesting. Please expand your study to include the top teams. Thanks. Gut feelings are more important... it is well known how many hypothetical matches Dake lost. No reason to get bogged down with stats and reality. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,047 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 this is ridiculous. it's getting to the point where you can't even spout off inflammatory summary opinions without evidence and not have people jump up your butt about 'data' and 'reality'. really wish people would just chill out and agree with everything i say. 4 tigerfan9311, JasonBryant, teach and 1 other reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jammen 336 Report post Posted February 11, 2015 If I only knew what I am trying to say then my prejudices wouldn't get in the way. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 12, 2015 (edited) this is ridiculous. it's getting to the point where you can't even spout off inflammatory summary opinions without evidence and not have people jump up your butt about 'data' and 'reality'. really wish people would just chill out and agree with everything i say. I framed them as inflammatory and summary. And consequently didn't expect such smug responses. What exactly was the thoughtful response that i rejected outright? Edited February 12, 2015 by hammerlockthree Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,047 Report post Posted February 12, 2015 I framed them as inflammatory and summary. And consequently didn't expect such smug responses. if you intentionally frame your comments as inflammatory and summary then you should probably expect some smugness in the responses you elicit, among other strong reactions. just sayin. What exactly was the thoughtful response that i rejected outright? i dunno. this sounds like a semantic death spiral waiting to happen. pass. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted February 12, 2015 Thats a new one, retreating for fear of a semantic argument developing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,047 Report post Posted February 12, 2015 Thats a new one, retreating for fear of a semantic argument developing. in enough time it will become an old one im sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigRedMachine 210 Report post Posted February 12, 2015 Thats a new one, retreating for fear of a semantic argument developing. Actually, last night I decided to retreat from one myself: http://board.themat.com/index.php?/topic/8612-ryan-taylor-vs-zane-richards/page-2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted March 8, 2015 Nick D just slammed into the Minnesota ceiling... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headshuck 2,589 Report post Posted March 8, 2015 Oh come on! You had that tee'd up :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hammerlockthree 2,587 Report post Posted March 8, 2015 (edited) Sorry for the record the Minnesota ceiling theory is still a cute little theory of mine, not a manifesto. Edited March 8, 2015 by hammerlockthree Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headshuck 2,589 Report post Posted March 8, 2015 Lizak - Seeded 7th placed 7th CD - Seeded 1st placed 1st ND - Seeded 2nd placed 3rd JS - Unseeded - MFF'ed out DN - Seeded 2nd placed 2nd Wanzek - Seeded 8th DNP Storley - Seeded 4th Placed 4th Pfarr - Seeded 4th placed 2nd Schiller - Seeded 3rd placed 3rd Kroells - Seeded 6th placed 5th Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
