ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 8, 2015 (edited) It has been many years since I have run the numbers and I thought I should check again. Yep, it is still true; Wrestling has more high school athletes vying for each spot on a NCAA team than any other sport. This is a good point to bring up when colleges are talking about when collage ADs are talking about cutting or expanding sports in their programs and they have the notion in their heads that "wrestling is a dying sport." 2013/14 MEN NFHS: WOMEN NFHS: NFHS NCAA NCAA NFHS NCAA NCAABaseball/Softball 482,629 32,635 15:1 365,711 18,618 20:1Basketball 541,054 17,812 30:1 364,297 16,643 22:1Bowling 25,751 1,155 22:1Fencing 2,189 593 4:1 1,774 625 3:1Field Hockey 61,471 5,670 11:1Football 1,093,234 69,847 16:1 Golf 152,647 8,441 18:1 72,172 4,981 14:1Gymnastics 1,995 300 7:1 19,231 1,695 11:1Ice Hockey 35,393 3,832 9:1 9,150 2,009 5:1Lacrosse 106,720 12,716 8:1 81,969 9,916 8:1Rifle 2,000 417 5:1 1,168 378 3:1Rowing 2,544 2,683 1:1 4,242 7,337 1:1Skiing 9,999 423 24:1 9,404 420 22:1Soccer 417,419 22,956 18:1 374,564 25,672 15:1Swim 138,373 9,368 15:1 165,779 11,910 14:1Tennis 160,545 7,787 21:1 184,080 8,603 21:1Track/XC 906,518 87,238 10:1 763,132 50,399 15:1Volleyball 52,149 1,705 31:1 429,634 16,818 26:1Water Polo 21,451 967 22:1 18,899 1,812 10:1Wrestling 269,514 6,653 41:1 Total 4,396,373 286,373 15:1 2,952,428 184,661 16:1 Sources: NFHS Participation Report and U.S. Department of Education Equity in Athletics Data Analysis Edited February 9, 2015 by ValkyrieWrestling 1 HuskyHero133 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ShannonSofield Report post Posted February 8, 2015 I like this stat. A nice little vanity metric to share among my friends implying it was harder for me to be a D1 starter than it was for them on the Basketball team. Though, I don't think it shoudl be translated as literally as that; I'm still going to run with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billyhoyle 2,480 Report post Posted February 8, 2015 Is that right that there are more college lacrosse players than HS lacrosse players? As for the dying sport thing...I think we are just beginning to tap the potential of our large HS base. You can call it the flowestling effect, but I think we will continue to see more young fans watch the sport because of flo, twitter, and fb. They can actually interact with guys like Dake/Taylor/Stieber..That makes them want to watch their matches and become fans..In 10 years they will be adults with $$$ to spend, and hopefully still fans. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 8, 2015 Billyhoyle, Lacrosse is worse than that. It looks like I only grabbed D1 for men's LAX. There are 12,716 men in all NCAA divisions. As for the dying sport thing...it is only true in the minds of NCAA D1 ADs. Everywhere else, it is growing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,050 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 Billyhoyle, Lacrosse is worse than that. It looks like I only grabbed D1 for men's LAX. There are 12,716 men in all NCAA divisions. you grabbed the number of high school lax teams instead of participants. there were 106,720 HS laxers in 2014. http://www.nfhs.org/ParticipationStatics/PDF/2013-14_Participation_Survey_PDF.pdf ratio is about 39.3:1, so actually pretty close to wrestling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 Thanks. I will update my file. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,050 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 cool, this is an interesting chart you put together. agree that the information supports the argument that wrestling opportunities should be increased at the college level. good stuff. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 (edited) Jaroslav, I have updated both the NFHS and NCAA numbers for men's lacross and now come up with a ratio of 8:1. Again thanks for the tip. Edited February 9, 2015 by ValkyrieWrestling Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RichB 227 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 I am sure your ratios accurately reflect the real world in that there are say 5 times as many per capita slots for Lacrosse as Wrestling. But the data from some states is somewhat suspect. Texas must be including all JrHi/MidSchool in with HS (they show 60+ on the Average Basketball team and 150 per school for football) Pennsylvania numbers reflect an estimate of the number of 10-12th graders times the number of schools with teams (wrestling 488 teams divided into 9760 participants is exactly 20.00000. - looking at schools with rosters about 20 for 10-12 seems correct). It really shouldn't be that hard. Federation should just get consistent (just 10-12, or 10-12 + 9th on varsity, or all 9th graders on Varsity JV JrHi),get them reported, and add them up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinnum 840 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 RichB - The numbers are likely correct. They call for all high school athletes so this would be any high school kid grades 9-12. Allen High in Texas went undefeated in football this year with 80 athletes on the varsity team. In addition to those guys they also field five other high school football teams (JV1, JV2, Freshman Blue, Freshman White, and Freshman Red). All six teams play their own schedule and there are many schools they compete against that also field six teams. (Via mobile) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
knox 1 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 This is a fantastic stat... thanks for sharing! Based on this chart, there's no question that more opportunities need to be made available for wrestling. Outside of wrestling, the chart also suggests that the ratios are roughly equivalent for men (15:1) and women (16:1). That seems to undercut the argument that Title IX unfairly discriminates against men. Without taking individual sports into consideration, it seems that male high school athletes (overall) have as many opportunities to compete in college as female high school athletes. Is that interpretation correct? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,050 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 right on. those fencing numbers are interesting. i knew a guy in high school, bigger kid and a good athlete, plated football and wrestled through middle school then quit wrestling to pick up fencing in high school. those numbers help explain the move. he got into his school of choice too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RichB 227 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 RichB - The numbers are likely correct. They call for all high school athletes so this would be any high school kid grades 9-12. Allen High in Texas went undefeated in football this year with 80 athletes on the varsity team. In addition to those guys they also field five other high school football teams (JV1, JV2, Freshman Blue, Freshman White, and Freshman Red). All six teams play their own schedule and there are many schools they compete against that also field six teams. (Via mobile) There is no doubt that the big rich schools(Allen, Permean, Odessa, Midland, etc) in Texas can field 200+ guys and a half dozen teams in grades 9-12. But beside 200 Class 6 Schools, there are 200 in each of 4 other divisions, The lower two divisions probably don't have 150 boys. All the other Southern states = FL, Ga, Al, Mi,La, Ark, Ok, Average 70-80 man squads. Again, Pennsylvania sports are all listed as evenly divisible. Wrestling 20.0000, Football 45.0000, XC 20.000, Golf 10.000. And Pa classification is based on 10-12. Oh Texas wrestling ~45 man squads. Looks reasonable if you just sample the first school on Track, But that is Allen with like 80. Then check another half dozen randomly and you see more like 10-30. I suppose someone could write a script to get an actual count from Track. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 Outside of wrestling, the chart also suggests that the ratios are roughly equivalent for men (15:1) and women (16:1). That seems to undercut the argument that Title IX unfairly discriminates against men. Without taking individual sports into consideration, it seems that male high school athletes (overall) have as many opportunities to compete in college as female high school athletes. Is that interpretation correct? That was my take on it. I also found it interesting that football has a ratio of 16:1, which belies its reputaion of hording the headcount. Track is interesting at 10:1 and with a large headcount. These figures include outdoor, indoor and cross-country. I bet there is a lot of overlap in participants in these three sports and coaches get more scholarship to share out over the duplicate squads. Also, they get to train for three season. Wrestling could learn from this. NWCA should have a long-term goal of making freestyle and greco-roman NCAA sports. (Don't a lot of schools compete in freestyle anyway?) That way, they could end up with 25-30 scholarships to share out. In most cases, it would not take much more coaching staff. Do the same for same for women's wrestling to address Title IX concerns. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Billyhoyle 2,480 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 That was my take on it. I also found it interesting that football has a ratio of 16:1, which belies its reputaion of hording the headcount. Track is interesting at 10:1 and with a large headcount. These figures include outdoor, indoor and cross-country. I bet there is a lot of overlap in participants in these three sports and coaches get more scholarship to share out over the duplicate squads. Also, they get to train for three season. Wrestling could learn from this. NWCA should have a long-term goal of making freestyle and greco-roman NCAA sports. (Don't a lot of schools compete in freestyle anyway?) That way, they could end up with 25-30 scholarships to share out. In most cases, it would not take much more coaching staff. Do the same for same for women's wrestling to address Title IX concerns. If you increase scholarships to 25-30, you may only have 5 schools fund wrestling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 9, 2015 If you increase scholarships to 25-30, you may only have 5 schools fund wrestling. That sounds a bit defeatist. If colleges can support nearly 90,00 track participants, there is no reason they cannot support 15,000 wrestlers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinnum 840 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Cross country, indoor track, and outdoor track are able to offer 12.6 mens scholarships combined. They also have a women counterpart to balance and often travel together and use the same coaching staffs to save money. In fact, there are a lot of schools where they have women teams in these sports but no mens teams and even when there are mens teams many don't offer the full allotment of scholarships. Making more than one wrestling season would be devastating to the sport and many programs would be cut overnight. (Mobile) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stp 564 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 I wonder where cross country ranks and only having 7 varsity "scoring" spots available. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsnej 199 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 good post can that HS fencing number be right? my son's HS had at least 50+ kids on the fencing team Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 Pinnum, I did not know that the track/XC limits were combined. Still 12.6 is better than 9.9. Everything you say about women's counterpart, travel, and coaching staffs could be true for wrestling as well. The women's counterpart would be the steepest climb but it is also the number one goal to expand our sport and insure its health. (Sidenote: Woman's wrestling in not yet an NCAA sport but there were 160 high school participants per college spots last year.) Nothing about adding more wrestling seasons would force schools to cut a team. If they don't want to fund the extra season, they don't have to. Only about half the schools with track teams compete in the indoor season. Only about 10% of schools with women's track team do not have a men's team. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 can that HS fencing number be right? my son's HS had at least 50+ kids on the fencing team I double checked the number and it is correct. There are only 93 high school with boy's fencing. Is there a hot bed region for fencing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pinnum 840 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 An athlete counts for each season they compete. So a 40 man wrestling roster with three seasons would mean that there would be 120 male wrestlers counted which would drastically skew participation numbers. What this chart doesn't show is that though opportunities across the board are about the same for men and women (if you don't look at individual sports), the number of men and women enrolled in college are not proportionate to high school enrollments and demand for collegiate roster spots are not proportionate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jaroslav Hasek 2,050 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 I double checked the number and it is correct. There are only 93 high school with boy's fencing. Is there a hot bed region for fencing? if that number is accurate than over half of every boy's HS fencing team is in NJ. i count 48. http://highschoolsports.nj.com/boysfencing/standings/?grouping=state-district-5 which all may be true. i knew guys in high school that had fencing letter jackets. girls too. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vsnej 199 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 I double checked the number and it is correct. There are only 93 high school with boy's fencing. Is there a hot bed region for fencing? my bad I was including both men & women in HS - but still, only 93 in the whole country seems surprisingly low (less than 2 per state) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ValkyrieWrestling 3 Report post Posted February 10, 2015 What this chart doesn't show is that though opportunities across the board are about the same for men and women (if you don't look at individual sports), the number of men and women enrolled in college are not proportionate to high school enrollments and demand for collegiate roster spots are not proportionate. Wouldn't the total line at the bottom of the chart show the opportunities across the board? So, 286,373 for men and 184,661 for women. Assuming boy/girl enrollment is pretty even for high school, the number of men and women enrolled in college are indeed not proportionate to high school enrollments. College men: 8,919,087, women: 11,723,732. (US Dept of Ed figures for 2012 for all colleges.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites