Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SetonHallPirate

My at-large projections...

Recommended Posts

SHP -

 

I am failing to understand why the 3rd Coaches Ranking / RPI is kept secret likes its a National Security Threat ?

 

Especially considering that he first 2 releases are made public on their website ?

 

Are they fearful of being 2nd guessed and criticized on Seedings ? 

 

Please enlighten me as you usually do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's why Kindig did. Stieber went out there to beat beitz and get his team a co-title.

 

(at LU Alum)

Actually in the pre-tourney interviews, it seemed that the staff didn't think Hunter could get a wildcard, thus making a qualifying big ten finish (7th or better at 149) necessary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carp, I can see the logic with Hammond over Wanzek, but I'm guessing what the committee WILL do, not what you think they should. As for McCall and Tavanello, I have to think that's your anti-Big Ten alter-ego posting, not you personally. You're usually much smarter than that.

Hope you are right about Tav making it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

125: Carson Kuhn, Boise State

133: Gary Wayne Harding, Oklahoma State

141: Jeff Canfora, Penn

149: Cody Ruggirello, Hofstra

157: Max Hvolbek, Stanford

165: Nick Kee, Appalachian State

174: Matt Reed, Oklahoma

184: Scott Marmoll, North Carolina

197: Nick Bonaccorsi, Pittsburgh

285: Garrett Ryan, Columbia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Kingsland

are you sure staudenmayer is out?

I'm not positive, but on the second day of the tournament he was on crutches the whole day, and believed he had torn his pcl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SHP..Why not Phil Bakuckus at 174lbs?

 

Has a better RPI and coaches ranking then Stanford wrestler. Also you have Oklahoma kid as 1st out at 174 but he was beat by Backukus. He also has a win over Pickett. I think Phil deserves that last spot at 174.

Edited by NJwrestlingguy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carp, I can see the logic with Hammond over Wanzek, but I'm guessing what the committee WILL do, not what you think they should. As for McCall and Tavanello, I have to think that's your anti-Big Ten alter-ego posting, not you personally. You're usually much smarter than that.

Hardly anti-Big Ten...If McCall was hurt, I'd like to see him get in.  Tavanello went 0-3, is 13-13 for the year and didn't make his case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...